Compulsory Education Reform between the Profession and Policy in the Light of Justice and Equal Opportunities
Abstract
Following the adoption of the conceptual design proposed by the White Paper in 1995 and the legislation adopted on this basis, the reform of primary school transformed its overall image. In the present paper, we discuss only some of the solutions and consider the events and changes that have occurred in the last twenty years, devoting special attention to the systemic, programme and process levels. At the systemic level, where the starting point was primarily to ensure justice and equal opportunities, we have managed to maintain an adequate public network and programme structure, despite various attempts to implement the solutions indicated in the White Paper of 2011, and notwithstanding interventions in the system that were not in fact always well thought out. Nonetheless, more attention should have been paid to reducing inequalities related to sociocultural circumstances and different regions in Slovenia. On the programme level, a consensus needs to be reached on what quality general education means to us; this would alleviate conflicting demands placed on teachers, students and planners of programme solutions. On the process level, however, we find that there is a lack of adequate professional support and systematic evaluation studies, as the quality of school cannot be judged solely on the basis of results from international research. In order to take a step forward on the process level, there is need for quality school-linked school policy that is based on various professions and aimed at raising quality rather than at self-promotion and budget cutting in the field of education.
Downloads
References
A budget for Europe 2020 - Part II: Policy fiches. (2011). European Commission.
Bahovec Dolar, E., Kodelja, Z., MarjanoviÄ Umek, L., Zgaga, P., KovaÄ Å ebart, M., Å imenc, M., & Krek, J. (1995). NaÄela in teoretiÄna izhodiÅ¡Äa [Principles and theoretical starting points]. In J. Krek (Ed.), Bela knjiga o vzgoji in izobraževanju v Republiki Sloveniji (pp. 11–34). Ministrstvo za Å¡olstvo in Å¡port.
Barle Lakota, A., & Bergant, K. (Eds.). (1997). Kurikularna prenova. Zbornik [Curricular renewal. Proceedings]. Nacionalni kurikularni svet.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1988). Družbena konstrukcija realnosti [The social construction of reality]. Cankarjeva založba.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2005). Against learning. Reclaiming a language for education in an age of learning. Nordisk Pedagogik, 25(1), 54–66.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Taylor & Francis.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2013). The beautiful risk of education. Paradigm Publishers.
Compulsory School Act [Zakon o osnovni Å¡oli (ZOsn)]. (1996). Ur. l. RS, 12/1996.
Compulsory School Act [Zakon o osnovni Å¡oli (ZOsn-UPB2)]. (2005). Ur. l. RS, 70/2005.
Design and introduction of a system for determining and ensuring the quality of educational organisations (kindergartens and schools) [Zasnova in uvedba sistema ugotavljanja ter zagotavljanja kakovosti vzgojno-izobraževalnih organizacij (vrtcev in šol) – KVIZ]. (2008). http://kviz.solazaravnatelje.si/
Egan, K. (2009). Zgodovina pedagoÅ¡ke zmote. NaÅ¡a progresivistiÄna dediÅ¡Äina od Herberta Spencerja do Johna Deweyja in Jeana Piageta [A history of pedagogical error. Our progressive heritage from Herbert Spencer to John Dewey and Jean Piaget]. Krtina.
Egelandsdal, K., & Riese, H. (2020). Never mind the gap: Formative assessment confronted with Dewey’s and Gadamer’s concept of experience. European Journal of Education, 55(1), 91–104.
Efficiency and equity in European education and training systems. (2006). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52006SC1096
Europe 2020. A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. (2010). European Commission.
Establishment, supplementation and pilot testing of the model of quality assessment and assurance in the field of education [Vzpostavitev, dopolnitev in pilotni preizkus modela ugotavljanja in zagotavljanja kakovosti na podroÄju vzgoje in izobraževanja – OPK]. (2016). http://solazaravnatelje.si/index.php/dejavnosti/projekti/projekti-evropskega-socialnega-sklada/vzpostavitev-dopolnitev-in-pilotni-preizkus-modela-ugotavljanja-in-zagotavljanja-kakovosti-na-podrocju-vzgoje-in-izobrazevanja
Furedi, F. (2016). Zapravljeno: zakaj Å¡ola ne izobražuje veÄ [Wasted: Why school is no longer educating]. Krtina.
Gaber, S., & MarjanoviÄ Umek, L. (2009). Å tudije (primerjalne) neenakosti [Studies of (comparative) inequalities]. PedagoÅ¡ka fakulteta UL.
Gaber, S., Cankar, G., MarjanoviÄ Umek, L., & TaÅ¡ner, V. (2012). The danger of inadequate conceptualisation in PISA for education policy. Compare, 42(4), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2012.658275
Gaber, S., & Tašner, V. (Eds.). (2017). Prihodnost šole v družbah dela brez dela [The future of school in societies of work without work]. Pedagoška fakulteta UL.
Gauchet, M. (2011). Znanje brez smisla? [Knowledge without sense?]. In M. C. Blais, M. Gauchet, & D. Ottavi (Eds.), O pogojih vzgoje (pp. 55–109). Krtina.
HoÄevar, A., & KovaÄ Å ebart, M. (2018). Skrb za uÄinkovitost predÅ¡olske vzgoje ali »mehki inženiring« delovne sile prihodnosti? [Concern for the effectiveness of preschool education or “soft engineering†of the future workforce?]. Sodobna pedagogika, 69(4), 6–29.
Inequality in Croatia: Inequalities in the education system report with policy recommendations [Nejednakost u Hrvatskoj: Nejednakosti u obrazovnom sustavu izvještaj sa policy preporukama]. (2016). Centar za mirovne studije.
Instructions for the work of the subject and programme curricular commissions [Navodila za delo predmetnih in programskih kurikularnih komisij]. (1996). Nacionalni kurikularni svet, PodroÄna kurikularna komisija za osnovno Å¡olo.
JeronÄić, M. (2016). Reprodukcija druÅ¡tvenih nejednakosti u obrazovanju: obrazovna inkluzija dece romske nacionalnosti u Srbiji [Reproduction of social inequalities in education: The educational inclusion of Roma children in Serbia]. Interkulturalnost, 11, 55–67.
Kodelja, Z. (2006). O praviÄnosti v izobraževanju [About justice in education]. Krtina.
Kobal Tomc, B., & ÄŒrnak-MegliÄ, A. (Eds.). (2016). Situacijska analiza položaja otrok v Sloveniji (druga faza): konÄno poroÄilo [Situational analysis of the situation of children in Slovenia (second phase): Final report]. InÅ¡titut Republike Slovenije za socialno varstvo.
KovaÄ, M., KovaÄ Å ebart, M., Vidmar, T., & Mažgon, J. (2020). Bralne navade v Sloveniji in bralne navade Å¡tudentov pedagoÅ¡kih programov: je kovaÄeva kobila bosa? [Reading habits in Slovenia and reading habits of students of pedagogical programmes: Is the blacksmith’s mare barefoot?]. Sodobna pedagogika, 71(2), 40–57.
KovaÄ Å ebart, M. (1998). NaÄela in cilji vzgoje in izobraževanja – razprave o podstati naÅ¡ega Å¡olskega sistema [Principles and goals of education – discussions on the basis of our school system]. Sodobna pedagogika, 49(1), 34–55.
KovaÄ Å ebart, M. (1999). Diferenciacija v polju Å¡olske prenove [Differentiation in the field of school renewal]. Sodobna pedagogika, 50(1), 72–87.
KovaÄ Å ebart, M. (2002). Samopodobe Å¡ole: konceptualizacija devetletke [Self-conceptions of school: A conceptualisation of a nine-year compulsory education]. Zavod Republike Slovenije za Å¡olstvo, Znanstveni inÅ¡titut Filozofske fakultete.
KovaÄ Å ebart, M. (2007a). Od papirnatega tigra do tigra brez papirja. Reformna pot slovenskega Å¡olstva [From a paper tiger to a paperless tiger. The reform path of Slovenian education]. Sodobna pedagogika, 58(2), 6–33.
KovaÄ Å ebart, M. (2007b). Merjeno z enakim vatlom? [Measured with the same ell?]. Å olski razgledi, 58(11), 3.
KovaÄ Å ebart, M. (2008). Ne vedo, kaj spreminjajo! [They don’t know what they’re changing!] Å olski razgledi, 59(6), 3.
KovaÄ Å ebart, M. (2010). Minister “minus 20 odstotkov†[Minister “minus 20 percentâ€]. Å olski razgledi, 61(3), 3.
KovaÄ Å ebart, M. (2011a). Se zgodovina ponavlja? [Is history repeating itself?]. Å olski razgledi, 62(8), 3.
KovaÄ Å ebart, M. (2011b). Razprava po razpravi, ki je skoraj ni bilo [Debate after a debate that was almost non-existent]. Å olski razgledi, 62(12), 3.
KovaÄ Å ebart, M. (2012). Srce boli, a obrezana drevesa (s)pomladi bolje cvetijo [The heart hurts, but pruned trees bloom better in the spring]. Å olski razgledi. 63(8), 3.
KovaÄ Å ebart, M. (2014, February 22). ÄŒas zamujenih javnih razprav: desetletje devetletke [A time of missed public debates: A decade of nine-year compulsory education]. Dnevnik, p. 17.
KovaÄ Å ebart, M. (2016a, July 30). DolgoroÄno praviÄno izobraževanje [Long-term equitable education]. Dnevnik. https://www.dnevnik.si/1042747607/slovenija/sola-in-drzava-dolgorocno-pravicno-izobrazevanje
KovaÄ Å ebart, M. (2016b, September 24). Družba znanja? Ne me hecat!: Å¡ola [The knowledge society? Don’t pull my leg!: School.]. Dnevnik. https://www.dnevnik.si/1042751595
KovaÄ Å ebart, M. (2017). Spoprijem z diskriminacijo in izkljuÄevanjem v javni Å¡oli: med pravicami in pripoznanjem [Tackling discrimination and exclusion in public school: Between rights and recognition]. Sodobna pedagogika, 68(2), 10–32.
KovaÄ Å ebart, M. (2019). Zdravi razum kot mesto boja za univerzalnost [Common sense as the place of a struggle for universality]. Sodobna pedagogika, 70(2), 10–30.
KovaÄ Å ebart, M., & KovaÄ, M. (2018). Knowledge, values, equity: Contemporary tendencies in education. Dr. KovaÄ.
KovaÄ Å ebart, M., & Krek, J. (2009). Vzgojna zasnova javne Å¡ole [The educational design of the public school]. PedagoÅ¡ka fakulteta UL.
KovaÄ Å ebart, M., & Å tefanc, D. (2017a). Izobraževanje otrok [Education of children]. In A. ÄŒrnak-MegliÄ & B. Kobal Tomc (Eds.), Položaj otrok v Sloveniji danes: situacijska analiza [The Situation of Children in Slovenia today: A situational analysis] (pp. 113–139). InÅ¡titut RS za socialno varstvo.
KovaÄ Å ebart, M., & Å tefanc, D. (2017b). Toward greater equity in education through prudent conceptual solutions: Some empirical findings and systemic recommendations. In M. SardoÄ, & S. Gaber (Eds.), Fifty years of the Coleman report (pp. 195–218). PedagoÅ¡ka fakulteta UL.
Krek, J. (Ed.). (1995). Bela knjiga o vzgoji in izobraževanju v Republiki Sloveniji [White paper on education in the Republic of Slovenia]. Ministrstvo za šolstvo in šport.
Krek, J., & Metljak, M. (Eds.). (2011). Bela knjiga o vzgoji in izobraževanju v Republiki Sloveniji [White paper on education in the Republic of Slovenia]. Zavod RS za šolstvo.
KrofliÄ, R. (1997). UÄno-ciljno in procesno-razvojno naÄrtovanje kurikula [Learning-goal and process-development curriculum planning]. In Kurikularna prenova. Zbornik (pp. 197–201). Nacionalni kurikularni svet.
Kuralt, Å . (2020, April 18). Ocenjevanje na daljavo ne more biti praviÄno [Remote assessment cannot be fair]. https://www.delo.si/novice/slovenija/ocenjevanje-na-daljavo-ne-more-biti-pravicno-300148.html
Liessmann, K. P. (2006). Theorie der Unbildung. Die Irrtümer der Wissensgesellschaft [Theory of non-education. Errors of the knowledge society]. Paul Zsolnay Verlag.
MarjanoviÄ Umek, L. (2008). Sprememb v vrtcu in Å¡oli je veliko, strokovnih podlag zanje malo [Many changes in kindergarten and school, few professional bases for them]. Delo, 50(155), 21.
MarjanoviÄ Umek, L., & KovaÄ Å ebart, M. (1995). Zasnova osnovne Å¡ole [The design of compulsory education]. In J. Krek (Ed.), Bela knjiga o vzgoji in izobraževanju v Republiki Sloveniji (pp. 70–135). Ministrstvo za Å¡olstvo in Å¡port.
Mlakar, L. (2020, August 28). Ministrica Kustec: Novi virus nas v Å¡olah ne bo veÄ presenetil [Minister Kustec: The new virus will no longer surprise us in schools.]. https://siol.net/novice/slovenija/ministrica-kustec-novi-virus-nas-v-solah-ne-bo-vec-presenetil-532744
MoÄnik, R. (1985). VRO je Ich – Ideal birokracije [VRO is Ich – The ideal of bureaucracy]. Problemi, 23(4), 34–36.
New or renewed curricula for nine-year compulsory education [Novi oziroma prenovljeni uÄni naÄrti v devetletki]. (1997). PodroÄna kurikularna komisija pri NKS.
Department of Pedagogy and Andragogy [Oddelek za pedagogiko in andragogiko]. (2020). Aktualno COVID-19 [The current COVID-19 situation]. https://pedagogika-andragogika.ff.uni-lj.si/aktualno-covid-19
OECD. Education policy outlook: Slovenia. (2016). https://www.oecd.org/slovenia/Education-Policy-Outlook-Country-Profile-Slovenia.pdf
OECD. (2017a). Early Learning Matters. OECD.
OECD. (2017b). Study on social and emotional skills. http://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/OECD-Study-on-Social-and-Emotional-Skills.pdf
OECD. Education at a glance: Slovenia. (2019). https://www.oecd.org/education/education-at-a-glance/EAG2019_CN_SVN.pdf
Official data on the share of children with a delayed start of schooling [Uradni podatki o deležu otrok z odloženim zaÄetkom Å¡olanja]. (2020). Ministrstvo za izobraževanje, znanost in Å¡port.
Organisation and financing of education act [Zakon o organizaciji in financiranju vzgoje in izobraževanja (ZOFVI)]. (1996). Ur. l. RS, 12/1996.
Organisation and financing of education act [Zakon o organizaciji in financiranju vzgoje in izobraževanja (ZOFVI-UPB5)]. (2007). Ur. l. RS, 16/2007.
Peršolja, M. (2020, May 15). Ko petica ne izmeri vsega znanja [When an ‘A’ does not measure all knowledge]. Dnevnik (pp. 14–15).
PluÅ¡ko, A., Koren, A., Trtnik Herlec, A., TrnavÄeviÄ, A., Zupanc, D., TkalÄiÄ, D., LorenÄiÄ, I., Krek, J., MarjanoviÄ Umek, L., Zorman, M., KovaÄ Å ebart, M., Zupanc Grom, R., Gaber, S., Tkalec, V., MilekÅ¡iÄ, V., & MedveÅ¡, Z. (1999). Ugotavljanje in zagotavljanje kakovosti v vzgoji in izobraževanju: ravnatelji, osnovna Å¡ola [Determining and ensuring quality in education: Principals, compulsory education]. Ministrstvo za Å¡olstvo in Å¡port.
PluÅ¡ko, A., Koren, A., Trtnik Herlec, A., TrnavÄeviÄ, A., Zupanc, D., TkalÄiÄ, D., LorenÄiÄ, I., Krek, J., MarjanoviÄ Umek, L., Zorman, M., KovaÄ Å ebart, M., Zupanc Grom, R., Gaber, S., Tkalec, V., MilekÅ¡iÄ, V., ViliÄ KlenovÅ¡ek, T., & MedveÅ¡, Z. (2001). Modro oko: spoznaj, analiziraj, izboljÅ¡aj: Ugotavljanje in zagotavljanje kakovosti v vzgoji in izobraževanju: 2001/2002 [Wise eye: Familiarise, analyse, improve: Identifying and ensuring quality in education: 2001/2002]. Zavod RS za Å¡olstvo.
Poverty and inequality in Bosnia and Herzegovina 2007–2011 [Siromaštvo i nejednakost u Bosni i Hercegovini 2007-2011]. (2015). http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/zh/976191468000247821/pdf/97643-REVISED-BOSNIAN-P132666-P152786-Box393190B-bt-BiH-poverty-and-Inequality-in-BiH.pdf
Pulliam, J. D., & Van Patten, J. (1996). History of Education in America. Macmillan.
Statement by Minister Simona Kustec and official spokesman Jelko Kacin regarding the current state of the COVID-19 epidemic [Izjava ministrice Simone Kustec in uradnega govorca Jelka Kacina v zvezi z aktualnim stanjem epidemije bolezni COVID-19]. (2020, 19 May). https://www.gov.si/novice/2020-05-19-izjava-ministrice-simone-kustec-in-uradnega-govorca-jelka-kacina-v-zvezi-z-aktualnim-stanjem-epidemije-bolezni-covid-19/
Å tefanc, D. (2008). Ideje neoliberalizma v procesih rekonceptualizacije obveznega sploÅ¡nega izobraževanja: nekatere teoretske poteze in praktiÄne implikacije [Ideas of neoliberalism in processes of the reconceptualisation of compulsory general education: Some theoretical features and practical implications]. Sodobna pedagogika, 59(3), 10–31.
Å tefanc, D. (2012). Kompetence v kurikularnem naÄrtovanju sploÅ¡nega izobraževanja [Competences in curricular planning of general education]. ZIFF.
Å tefanc, D., & KovaÄ Å ebart, M. (2020) Nekaj razmislekov o razmerju med formativnim spremljanjem in ocenjevanjem znanja [Some reflections on the relationship between formative monitoring and knowledge assessment]. Sodobna pedagogika, 71(1), 10–31.
Universal declaration of human rights [SploÅ¡na deklaracija Älovekovih pravic]. (2018). Fakulteta za družbene vede and Ministrstvo za zunanje zadeve Republike Slovenije.
Vidmar, T. (2011). Šola in pojmovanja znanja med pragmatizmom in konstruktivizmom [School and conceptions of knowledge between pragmatism and constructivism]. Sodobna pedagogika, 62(1), 28–40.
Žagar, D., PeÄjak, S., & Peklaj, C. (2003). Organizacija nivojskega pouka, staliÅ¡Äa uÄencev, uÄiteljev in starÅ¡ev do te oblike diferenciacije ter njeni uÄinki na uÄence: evalvacijska Å¡tudija [The organisation of streamed lessons, the attitudes of students, teachers and parents towards this form of differentiation and its effects on students: An evaluative study]. Filozofska fakulteta Univerze v Ljubljani.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
