The Impact of Specific Social Factors on Changes in Education in Serbia
Abstract
The political and economic changes that followed the adoption of the Strategy for the Development of Education in Serbia 2020 essentially betrayed the basic ideas and intentions of the strategy, creating a systematic threat to education and its role in the development of Serbia. This created an almost experimental situation for analysing the impact of political and social factors on changes in education. In the sphere of politics, new trends have emerged (centralisation of power; marginalisation of democratic institutions; encouraging foreign investment in companies with a low technological level, etc.) that strongly influenced changes (‘reforms’) in education (great centralisation in education, the strong influence of politics on education, imposing of some lower-level forms of education, reducing professional autonomy, etc.). The basic mechanism of transferring the general policy to education is changing the role of the most important national institutions in defining and implementing education policy: the National Education Council, the National Council for Vocational and Adult Education, the National Council for Higher Education, and the National Accreditation Body. The adoption of new education laws (2017) radically changed their status and competencies, resulting in a reduction of their independence and professionalism and strengthening the role of the ministry, through which the influence of the ruling political regime is transferred. Also, the role of the Chamber of Commerce in education has been strengthened. Such a system endangers the autonomy of educational institutions and teachers, as well as the quality of education. Consequently, these changes have a clear impact on the country’s development and its international position.
Downloads
References
Action plan for implementation of the strategy for education development in Serbia 2020, Strategy of education development in Serbia to 2020. (2020).
Bates, A. W. (2004). Technology and lifelong learning: Myths and realities. David Murphy, Ronnie Carr, James.
Ben-Chaim, D., Joffe, N., & Zoller, U. (1994). Empowerment of elementary school teachers to implement science curriculum reforms. School Science & Mathematics, 94(7), 355–366.
Boulton, H. (2008). Managing e-Learning: What are the real implications for schools? The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 6(1), 11–18.
Brooks, M. G. (1991). Centralised curriculum: Effects on the local school level. In M. F. Klein (Ed.), The politics of curriculum decision-making - Issues in Centralizing Curriculum (pp. 151–166). State University of New York Press.
Bureao of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (2020). Employment Projections — 2019-2029. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/ecopro.pdf
Chomsky, N. (2017). Chomsky on miseducation. In D. Macedo (Ed.). Eduka.
Cooper, B. S., Cibulka, J. G., & Fusarelli, L. D. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of education politics and policy. Routledge.
Education forum. (2017). Critical analysis of new measures in education in Serbia by Ivan Ivić, Belgrade. http://eduforum.rs/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/KRITICKA-ANALIZA-NOVIH-MERA-U-OBRAZOVANJU-U-SRBIJI.pdf
ENQA Agency Review. (2020). National entity for accreditation and quality assurance in higher education (NEAQA) by Doris Herrmann, Durdica Dragojevic, Pedro Teixeira, Ignas Gaiziunas, 20 February 2020.
https://enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/NEAQA-external-review-report.pdf
Erss, M. (2015). The politics of teacher autonomy in Estonia, Germany, and Finland. Graphic Design: FPCEUP’s Communication Office/Manuel Francisco Costa, 29, 61-75.
Fuhrman, S. H. (1989). State politics and education reform. The politics of reforming school administration, 61–75.
Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. Jossey-Bass.
Fullan, M. (Ed.). (2014). Teacher development and educational change. Routledge.
Gerrard, J., & Farrell, L. (2014). Remaking the professional teacher: Authority and curriculum reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(5), 634–655.
Griffin, G. A. (1991). Teacher education and curriculum decision making: The issue of teacher professionalism. In M. F. Klein (Ed.), The politics of curriculum decision-making - Issues in Centralizing Curriculum (pp. 121–150). State University of New York Press.
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2015). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.
Ivić, I. (2008). Teorija Vigotskog i neke varijante post-vigotskijanskih teorija i njihove implikacije po didaktiÄku interakciju u inkluzivnoj Å¡koli [Vygotsky’s theory and some variants of post-Vygotsky theories and their implications for didactic interaction in an inclusive school]. Workshop on Vygotsky theory and inclusive education, James Wertsch, SAD & Ivan Ivić, Serbia. University of Oslo.
Ivic, I. (2019). Printed and digital media: Printed and digital textbooks. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 9(3), 25–49.
Ivic, I., & Pesikan, A. (2012). Education system reforms in an unstable political situation: the case of Serbia in the first decade of the 21st century. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 2(2), 31–53.
Ivić, I., Pešikan, A., & Antić, S. (2003). Active Learning 2. Faculty of Philosophy, Institute of Psychology and UNICEF.
Kaya, E., Cetin, P. S., & Yıldırım, A. (2012). Transformation of centralized curriculum into classroom practice: An analysis of teachers’ experiences. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 2(3), 103–114.
Law, N., Pelgrum, W. J., & Plump, T. (2006). Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world. Findings from the IEA SITES. Springer.
Law on dual education [Zakon o dualnom obrazovanju]. (2017/2020). Službeni glasnik RS, No. 101/2017 & 6/2020.
Law on the education system foundations [Zakon o osnovama sistema vaspitanja i obrazovanja]. (2017/2018/2019/2020). Službeni glasnik RS, No. 88/2017, 27/2018 - dr. zakon, 10/2019, 27/2018 - dr. zakoni 6/2020.
Law on preschool education [Zakon o predškolskom vaspitanju i obrazovanju]. (2010/2017/2018/2019). Službeni glasnik RS, No. 18/2010, 101/2017 & 113/2017.
Law on primary education [Zakon o osnovnom obrazovanju i vaspitanju]. (2013/2017). Službeni glasnik RS, No. 55/2013 & 101/2017.
Law on secondary education [Zakon o srednjem obrazovanju i vaspitanju]. (2013/2017). Službeni glasnik RS, No. 55/2013 & 101/2017.
Law on textbooks and other teaching materials [Zakon o udžbenicima i drugim nastavnim sredstvima]. (2018). Službeni glasnik RS, No. 27/2018.
Law on higher education [Zakon o visokom obrazovanju]. (2017/2018). Službeni glasnik RS, No. 88/2017, 27/2018 & 73/2018.
Lin, Y. P. (2018). Is online learning as effective as the evidence suggests? Institute for Global Business Research, Conference Proceedings, 2(3), 17–25.
McCutcheon, K., Lohan, M., Traynor, M., & Martin, D. (2015). A systematic review evaluating the impact of online or blended learning vs. faceâ€toâ€face learning of clinical skills in undergraduate nurse education. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(2), 255–270.
McGregor, G. (2009). Educating for (whose) success? Schooling in an age of neoâ€liberalism. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(3), 345–358.
McNeil, L. M. (1988). Contradictions of control, Part 1: Administrators and teachers. Phi Delta Kappan, 69(5), 333–39.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., &Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–47.
Murphy, R. J. (2018). Finding the emic in systemic design. OCAD University Open Research Repository.
Nguyen, T. (2015). The effectiveness of online learning: Beyond no significant difference and future horizons. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 309–319. http://jolt.merlot.org/Vol11no2/Nguyen_0615.pdf
Ni, A. Y. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of classroom and online learning: Teaching research methods. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 19(2), 199–215.
PeÅ¡ikan, A., & ParojÄić, J. (2020). Harmonizacija NAT-a sa standardima i smernicama za osiguranje kvaliteta u evropskom prostoru visokog obrazovanja. Elaborat u okviru projekta ReDIS 2030 [Harmonization of NAB with standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European Higher Education Area. Study within the project ReDIS 2030]. EU Support to Reform of Education in Serbia.
PeÅ¡ikan, A. (2020). UÄenje u obrazovnom kontekstu [Learning in educational context]. Službeni glasnik.
Pike, K. L. (1967). Etic and emic standpoints for the description of behavior. In K. L. Pike (Ed.), Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior (pp. 37–72). Mouton & Co.. https://doi.org/10.1037/14786-002
Progress Report on Action Plan for the Implementation of the Strategy for Education Development in Serbia 2020, MPNTR (2018). http://www.mpn.gov.rs/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/AP-SROS-IZVESTAJ-15jun-Eng.pdf
Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and emotion, 28(2), 147–169.
Roehrig, G. H., & Kruse, R. A. (2005). The role of teachers’ beliefs and knowledge in the adoption of a Reformâ€Based curriculum. School science and mathematics, 105(8), 412–422.
Roehrig, G. H., Kruse, R. A., & Kern, A. (2007). Teacher and school characteristics and their influence on curriculum implementation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 883–907.
SEDS (Strategy for Education Development in Serbia 2020). (2012). Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Serbia, Belgrade.
Šuvaković, U. V. (2019). Some (social) aspects of education in transition Serbia. Sociološki pregled, 53(3), 943–977.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
Youdell, D. (2010). School trouble: Identity, power and politics in education. Routledge.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
