Art Appreciation as a Learned Competence: A Museum-based Qualitative Study of Adult Art Specialist and Art Non-Specialist Visitors
Abstract
Since Bourdieu, it has been argued that art appreciation requires “knowledgeâ€. The focus of this qualitative study was to examine art appreciation as a learned competence by exploring two different groups of museum visitors: art specialists and art non-specialists. The research was conducted at Moderna galerija in Ljubljana. Twenty-three adults were recruited and accompanied during their visit to the museum. Participants were requested to “think out loudâ€, which meant to talk about what they saw, thought, and felt about the artworks. There was a short interview conducted with each participant before entering the museum to gain insight into their art-related and museum-visiting experience. The analysis of the data revealed that some processes of art appreciation were similar within the two groups. Both art specialists and art nonspecialists interact with museum objects physically and intellectually; they see contents and formal qualities as a whole; they respond emotionally to artworks; appreciation includes their personal experience; they search museum interpretation/information for their understanding. Some noticeable differences were found. Art specialists respond to artworks with more understanding and are willing to put more effort into art appreciation, whereas art non-specialists respond with less understanding and put less effort into art appreciation. This paper focuses on the differences between the two groups; reflective and spontaneous
appreciation of art, objective and subjective appreciation of art and the effort put into art appreciation. The paper ends with a discussion of the implications of the study for the teaching of art and museum education.
Downloads
References
Bourdieu, P., & Darbel, A. [1969] (1991). The Love of Art: European Art Museums and their Public. Cambridge: Polity Press.
BraÄun Sova, R., & Kemperl, M. (2012). The Curricular Reform of the Art Education in Primary School in Slovenia in Terms of Certain Components of European Competence of Cultural Awareness and Expression. CEPS Journal, 2(2), 71-91.
Duh, M., & Korošec, A. (2014). The Development of Art Appreciation Abilities of Pupils in Primary School. The New Educational Review, 36(2), 42-54.
Duh, M., ZupanÄiÄ, T., & ÄŒagran, B. (2014). Development of Art Appreciation in 11-14 year-old Students. The International Journal of Art & Design Education, 33(2), 208-222.
Duh, M. (2014). Razvijanje likovne apreciacije s srednješolci. Pedagoška obzorja, 29(1), 60-75.
Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from Museums: Visitor Experiences and the Making of Meaning. Walnut Creek, Lanham, New York, Oxford: AltaMira Press.
Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2013). The Museum Experience Revisited. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
Flick, U. (2009). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore: Sage Publications.
Fritsch, J. (Ed.) (2011). Museum Gallery Interpretation and Material Culture. London, New York: Routledge.
Hooper-Greenhill, E. (1991). Museum and Gallery Education. Leicester: Leicester University Press.
Hooper-Greenhill, E. (1999). Learning in Art Museums: Strategies of Interpretation. In E. Hooper-Greenhill (Ed.), The Educational Role of the Museum (pp. 44-52). London, New York: Routledge.
Hooper-Greenhill, E., & Moussouri, T. (2001). Making Meaning in Art Museums 2: Visitors†Interpretive Strategies at Nottingham Castle Museum and Art Gallery. Leicester: Research Centre for Museums and Galleries (RCMG), University of Leicester.
Hooper-Greenhill, E., Moussouri, T., Hawthorne, E., & Riley, R. (2001). Making Meaning in Art Museums 1: Visitors†Interpretive Strategies at Wolverhampton Art Gallery. Leicester: Research Centre for Museums and Galleries (RCMG), University of Leicester.
ICOM. (2013). ICOM Code of of Ethics for Museums. Paris: International Council of Museums. Lachapelle, R. (1999). Comparing the Aesthetic Responses of Expert and Non-Expert Viewers.
Canadian Review of Art Education, 26(1), 6-21.
Lachapelle, R. (2007). Non-Expert Adults†Art-Viewing Experiences: Conjugating Substance with Struggle. In P. Villeneuve (Ed.), Art Museum Education in the 21st Century (pp. 123-128). Reston (VA): National Art Education Association.
Lachapelle, R., Douesnard, M., & Keenlyside, E. (2009). Investigating Assumptions about the Relationship between Viewing Duration and Better Art Appreciation. Studies in Art Education, 50(3), 245-256.
Lachapelle, R., Murray, D., & Neim, S. (2003). Aesthetic Understanding as Informed Experience: The Role of Knowledge in our Art Viewing Experiences. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 37(3), 78-98.
McClellan, A. (Ed.) (2006). Art and its Publics. Museum Studies at the Millenium. Malden, Oxford, Carlton: Blackwell Publishing.
Olsen, S. H. (1998). Appreciation. In M. Kelly (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Aesthetics (pp. 66-68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rapley, T. (2004). Interviews. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative Research Practice (pp. 15-33). London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
TavÄar, L. (2009). Homo spectator. Uvod v muzejsko pedagogiko. Ljubljana: PedagoÅ¡ki inÅ¡titut.
Whitehead, C. (2012). Interpreting Art in Museums and Galleries. London, New York: Routledge.
Zakaras, L., & Lowell. F. J. (2008). Cultivating Demand for the Arts: Arts Learning, Arts Engagement, and State Arts Policy. Pittsburgh: RAND Corporation.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
