Rethinking Legislation Governing Academic Integrity in the European Context

  • MiloÅ¡ BoÅ¡ković Project Office, University of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro
Keywords: academic integrity, law, Montenegro, Council of Europe


This paper argues that legislative intervention rather than deontological rules could be an adequate tool to address academic integrity concerns, particularly in civil law jurisdictions, which is the case in the majority of European countries. The recently enacted Montenegrin law on academic integrity offers a promising foundation for developing such an intervention in the European context, along with  suggested improvements drawing upon four years of the implementation experience. Analysis of the law is also conducted with regard to several provisions of the Council of Europe’s recently adopted Recommendation on Education Fraud. The paper does not offer a ready-made concept, but its deliberation can serve as an inspiration for governments trying to improve existing rules on academic integrity. A legal approach will be taken in examining the problems and the relevant legislation.


Download data is not yet available.


Academic Integrity Charter for UK Higher Education (2020). The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education 2020.

Bassler, S. A. (2001). Public access to law school honor code proceedings. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 15(1), 207–244.

Behrens, R. (2017). A study Being an ombudsman in higher education. A comparative Study. European Network of Ombudsmen in Higher Education.

Bergadaà, M. (2021). Academic integrity. Understanding it to take responsible action.

Berger, C. J., & Berger, V. (1999). Academic discipline: A guide to fair process for the university student. Columbia Law Review, 99(2), 289–364.

Bertram Gallant, T. (2008). Academic integrity in the twenty-first century: A teaching and learning imperative. ASHE Higher Education Report, 33(5), 1–143.

Blecic, M., Djokovic, R., Pekovic, S., & Vuckovic, D. (2020). Attitudes towards cheating behavior during assessing students’ performance: Student and teacher perspectives. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 16(13), 1–28.

Bretag, T. (2016). Discipline-specific approaches to academic integrity. In T. Bretag (ed.), Handbook of Academic Integrity (pp. 671–676). Springer Singapore.

Boskovic, M., & Vukcevic, M. (2016). Judicial system in Montenegro (historical development, basic principles, and organisation). Law & Justice Review, 7(13), 1–27.

Callahan, J. L. (2014). Creation of a moral panic? Self-plagiarism in the academy. Human Resource Development Review, 13(1), 3–10.

Carroll, J., & MacDonald, R. (2006). Plagiarism – A complex issue requiring a holistic institutional approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(2), 233–245.

Cinali, G. (2016). Middle Eastern perspectives of academic integrity: A view from the Gulf Region. In T. Bretag (ed.), Handbook of Academic Integrity (pp. 113–134). Springer Singapore.

Clermont, K. M., & Sherwin, E. (2002). A comparative view of standards of proof. Cornell Law Faculty Publications, 222(1), 243–275.

Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe. (2022). Recommendation CM/Rec(2022)18 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on Countering Education Fraud. Council of Europe.

Council of Europe (2016). Towards a pan-European platform on ethics, transparency and integrity in education (Volume 1). 7th Prague Forum on educational policies in Europe conducted at the meeting of representatives of 50 States Parties to the European Cultural Convention organized by the Council of Europe, Czech Republic`s Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports, Charles University in Prague and the Faculty of Education in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.

Dawson, P. (2020). Cybersecurity: The next academic integrity frontier. In T. Bretag (ed.), A Research Agenda for Academic Integrity (pp. 187–199). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Devine, T., & Reaves, A. (2016). Whistleblowing and research integrity: Making a difference through scientific freedom. In T. Bretag (ed.), Handbook of Academic Integrity (pp. 957–972). Springer Singapore.

Draft Law on Academic Integrity, Ukraine (2021). The National Agency for Higher Education Quality Assurance (Ukraine).

Draper, M. J., & Newton, Ph. M. (2017). A legal approach to tackling contract cheating? International Journal for Educational Integrity, 13(11), 1–16.

Drenth, P., & Israel, M. (2016). Research integrity: Perspectives from Australia and Netherlands. In T. Bretag (ed.), Handbook of Academic Integrity (pp. 789–808). Springer Singapore.

EtiÄki komitet (2020). IzvjeÅ¡taj o radu za period 1. 11. 2019 – 1. 11. 2020. godine [Ethics Committee (2020). Report on its work for the period November 2019–November 2020].

EtiÄki komitet (2023). IzvjeÅ¡taj o radu za period mart 2022 – mart 2023. godine [Ethics Committee (2023). Report on its work for the period March 2022–March 2023].

EtiÄki odbor Univerziteta Crne Gore (2020). IzvjeÅ¡taj o radu za period 2020-2021. godina [Ethics board of the University of Montenegro (2022). Report on its work for 2020–2021].

European Court of Human Rights (2022). Guide on Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights: Right to a fair trial (civil limb). Council of Europe/European court of Human Rights.

European Network for Academic Integrity (2019). General guidelines for academic integrity.

Gibney, E., & Wyatt, T. (2020). Rebuilding the harm principle: Using an evolutionary perspective to provide a new foundation for justice. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 9(3), 100–115.

Gilmore, B. (2008). Plagiarism: Why it happens and how to prevent it. Heinemann.

Glendinning, I. (2016). European perspectives of academic integrity. In T. Bretag (ed.), Handbook of Academic Integrity, (pp. 55–74). Springer Singapore.

Gonzalez Fuster, G., & Gutwirth, S. (2016). Promoting integrity as an integral dimension of excellence in research: D II.4 Legal analysis. PRINTEGER.

Hallak, J., & Poisson, M. (2005). Ethics and corruption in education: An overview. Journal of Education for International Development, 1(1), 1–16.

Hamilton, T., & Smith, I. (2017). Baseline assessment of integrity in higher education in Montenegro. Council of Europe.

Howard, R. M., & Jamieson, S. (2019). Rethinking the relationship between plagiarism and academic integrity. Revue Internationale des Technologies en Pédagogie Universitaire, 16(2), 69–86.

Jørgensen, T. E. (2018). Evaluations of nine higher education institutions in Montenegro. System review report. European University Association.

Kodama, S. (2019). Bentham’s distinction between law and morality and its contemporary significance. Revue d’études benthamiennes, 16, 1–10.

Law on academic integrity, Montenegro (2019). The Ethics Commitee.

Lin, H., Ye, Q., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2021). The next steps in academic integrity – education, awareness, norms, duty and law, Forensic Sciences Research, 6(4), 341–346.

Löfström, E. (2016). Academic integrity in social sciences. In T. Bretag, (ed.), Handbook of Academic Integrity (pp. 713–738). Springer Singapore.

McCabe, D. L., & Pavela, G. (2004). Ten (updated) principles of academic integrity: How faculty can foster student honesty. Change, 36(3), 10–15.

Obrazloženje uz Zakon o akademskom integritetu (2019). [Explanatory note to the law on academic integrity].

Penders, B. (2018). Beyond trust: Plagiarism and truth. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 15(1), 29–32.

Popovic, M., Tiefenbacher. W., & Uljarevic, D. (2016). Academic honour in Montenegrin manner – plagiarism in Montenegro and (lack of) its processing. Centre for Civic Education.

Posner, R. A. (2007). The little book of plagiarism (1st ed.). Pantheon Books.

Resnik, D. B. (2014). Data fabrication and falsification and empiricist philosophy of science. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(2), 423–431.

Santosa, D. A., & Siaputra, I. B. (2016). Academic integrity campaign in Indonesia. In T. Bretag (ed.), Handbook of Academic Integrity (pp. 75–86). Springer Singapore.

Selic, A., & Vujovic, Z. (2010). Policy for fighting against corruption in education.

Dlabolová, D., Foltýnek, T., Glendinning, I., Lancaster, T., & Linkeschová, D. (2017). South East European Project on Policies for Academic Integrity (SEEPAI). Final report commissioned by Council of Europe Pan-European Platform on Ethics, Transparency and Integrity in Education (ETINED).

Sudarmanti, R., & Yusuf, K. (2020). Reviewing literature research on integrity issues. In H. D. Mulyaningsih (ed.), Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Anti-Corruption and Integrity (pp. 102–106).

Taekema, S. (2018). Theoretical and normative frameworks for legal research: Putting theory into practice, Law and Method, 1–17.

Terré, D. (2004). Droit, morale et sociologie [Law, moral, and sociology]. L’Année sociologique, 54, 483–509.

The Academic Integrity Bill, India (2021). Rajya Sabha.

WB Higher Education and Research for Innovation and Competitiveness – (HERIC) project (2016). Feasibility study on the proposed tailor-made system(s) for the prevention of plagiarism in Montenegro.

How to Cite
Bošković, M. (2023). Rethinking Legislation Governing Academic Integrity in the European Context. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 13(3), 11-32.