Assessment Accommodations for Foreign Pupils in the Light of Educational Justice: Empirical Research among Slovenian Primary School Teachers
The starting points of primary school pupils in a foreign country differ significantly from those of native pupils. In Slovenia, the knowledge of pupils who are foreign citizens (foreign pupils) may be assessed with different accommodations for no more than two years. The presented research conducted on a representative sample of 697 Slovenian primary school teachers addresses their perspectives, using a questionnaire, on assessment accommodations for foreign pupils. The following research questions are answered: 1) What are teachers’ perceptions of assessment accommodations for foreign pupils; are there differences between teachers who had recently taught foreign pupils and those who had not? 2) Do generalist teachers have different perceptions than subject teachers do? 3) What kind of assessment accommodations do teachers practice for these pupils after the expiration of the two-year period; do generalist and subject teachers act differently? 4) Do teachers perceive assessment accommodations as being just? We demonstrate that teachers who have recent experience of teaching foreign pupils are more aware of the need for assessment accommodations than those who do not. The majority of the teachers accommodate assessment and grading even after the two-year period, especially generalist teachers. Additionally, some of them have lower expectations with regard to achieving knowledge standards for these pupils. While the majority of the teachers perceive accommodated assessment as being just, they are unsure of whether the period of allowed adjustments should be longer. This raises the questions about teachers’ understanding of educational justice and the application of the principle of justice in practice.
Bobbio, N. (1995). Eguaglianza e libertà. Torino: Einaudi.
Kodelja, Z. (2006). O pravičnosti v izobraževanju [On Juctice in Education]. Ljubljana: Krtina.
Kovač Šebart, M., & Krek, J. (2009). Justice in the Assessment of Knowledge: The Opinions of Teachers and Parents. In A. Kozłowska & J. Muršak (Eds.), Poland, Slovenia, the World: Challenges of Present-day Education (pp. 193–207). Krakow: Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University: Krakow Society for Education.
Levels, M., & Dronkers, J. (2008). Educational Performance of Native and Immigrant Children from Various Countries of Origin. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31(8), 1404–1425.
Medveš, Z. (2002). Nova paradigma pravičnosti v šoli [The New Paradigm of Juctice in School]. Sodobna pedagogika, 53(5), 24–41.
Meuret, D. (2001). School Equity as a Matter of Justice. In W. Hutmacher, D. Cochrane & N. Bottani (Eds.), In Pursuit of Equity in Education: Using International Indicators to Compare Equity Policies (pp. 93–111). New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
OECD (2010). PISA 2009 Results: What Students Know and Can Do – Student Performance in Reading, Mathematics and Science (Volume I). Paris: OECD Publishing.
Perelman, C. (1963). The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument. New York: The Humanities Press.
Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Scott, S., Webber, C. F., Lupart, J. L., Aitken, N., & Scott, D. E. (2014). Fair and Equitable Assessment Practices for All Students. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(1), 52–70.
Šori, I., Šušterič, N., & Gaber, S. (2011). Immigrant Students’ Achievements in Croatia, Serbia and Slovenia in Context. CEPS Journal, 1(3), 31–50.
Webber, C. F., & Lupart, J. (2011). Leading Intercultural inclusive schools: An International Perspective. International Studies in Educational Administration, 39(1), 3–18.
In order to ensure both the widest dissemination and protection of material published in CEPS Journal, we ask Authors to transfer to the Publisher (Faculty of Education, University of Ljubljana) the rights of copyright in the Articles they contribute. This enables the Publisher to ensure protection against infringement.