Variations in Primary Teachers’ Responses and Development during Three Major Science In- Service Programmes

  • Tina Jarvis
  • Anthony Pell
  • Philip Hingley
Keywords: IBSE, In-service, Investigative-based science education, Motivation, Primary education

Abstract

This paper reports on how different types of teachers responded to in-service aimed at developing investigative-based science education (IBSE) in primary schools, and the extent to which they applied their new skills in the classroom. Common items from evaluation questionnaires allowed data to be combined from three major in-service programmes. Using complete data sets from 120 teachers, cluster analysis enabled three teacher types to be identified: a small group of ‘science unsures’, with low attitude scores and little confidence, who showed no response to the innovation; ‘holistic improvers’, who showed the largest improvement in science teaching confidence; and ‘high level, positive progressives’, who were very positive to science teaching throughout and showed gains in confidence in teaching
physics and chemistry, as well as in demonstrating the relevance of science to their pupils. Taking account of these teacher types alongside interviews and observations, nine  developmental stages in how teachers apply their new expertise in the classroom and the whole school are suggested. Major factors influencing application in the classroom are the teachers’ initial science knowledge and pedagogical expertise, and motivating feedback to teachers when pupils responded positively to the innovation. Assessing teachers’ initial level of subject knowledge and science pedagogical expertise to inform the approach and amount of in-service provision is important. Subsequent mentoring as well as support from the school principal when teachers first try IBSE with pupils promotes successful implementation
in the classroom. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1999). Statistics for psychology. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Towards a unifying theory of behavioural change.
Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.

Blatchford, P. (1992). Children’s attitudes to work at 11 years. Educational Studies, 18,
107–118.

den Brook, P., Fisher, D. & Scott, R. (2005). The importance of teacher interpersonal
behaviour for student attitudes in Brunei primary science classes. International Journal of
Science Education, 27(7), 3,765–779.

Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber H. A., & Shouse A.W. (Eds.) (2007). Taking science to school:
Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Gago, J. M. (2004). Increasing human resources for science and technology in Europe.
Brussels EC conference ‘Europe needs more scientists’ 2 April.

Germann, P. J. (1988). Development of the attitude toward science in school assessment
and its use to investigate the relationship between science achievement and attitude
toward science in school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 689-703.

Glasersfeld, E. von (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London:
Falmer Press.

Guskey, T. R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the
implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching & Teacher Education, 4(1), 63-69.

Harlen, W. (1997). Primary teachers’ understanding in science and its impact in the
classroom. Research in Science Education, 27(3), 323-337.

Harlen, W., & Holroyd, C. (1997). Primary teachers’ understanding of concepts of science:
impact on confidence and teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 19(1),
93–105.

Jarvis, T., & Pell, A. (2002). Changes in primary boys’ and girls’ attitudes to school and
science during a two-year science in-service programme. The Curriculum Journal, 13(1),
43-69.

Jarvis, T., & Pell, A. (2004). Primary teachers’ changing attitudes and cognition during a
two-year science in-service programme and their effect on pupils. International Journal of
Science Education, 26(14), 1787-1811.

Jarvis, T., Pell, A., & McKeon, F. (2003). Changes in primary teachers’ science knowledge
and understanding during a two year in-service programme. Research in Science &
Technological Education, 21(1), 17-42.

Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1980). Improving in-service training: the messages of research.
Educational Leadership, 37(5), 379-385.

Lee, O. (1995). Subject matter knowledge, classroom management, and instructional
practices in middle school science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
32(4), 423–440.

Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., & Foy, P. (with Olson, J. F., Erberber, E., Preuschoff, C., &
Galia, J.) (2008). TIMSS 2007 International science report: Findings from IEA’s trends in
international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill,
MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.

Office for Standards in Education (OFSTED) (2006). The logical chain: Continuing
professional development in effective schools. London, HMI 2639.

Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. London:
Kings College.

Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (1996). Primary science: past and future directions. Studies in
Science Education, 26, 99–147.

Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content
knowledge (PCK); PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals.
Research in Science Education, 38, 261-284.

Pell, A., & Jarvis, T. (2001). Developing attitude to science scales for use with children
of ages from five to eleven years. International Journal in Science Education, 23(8), 847-862.

Pell, A., & Jarvis, T. (2003). Developing attitude to science scales for use with primary
teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 25(10), 1273-1295.
Rocard, M. (2008). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe.
Brussels: European Commission.

She, H., & Fisher, D. (2002). Teacher communication behavior and its association with
students’ cognitive and attitudinal outcomes in science in Taiwan. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching, 39(1), 63–78.

Stein, M. K., & Wang M. C. (1988). Teacher development and school improvement: the
process of teacher change. Teaching & Teacher Education, 4(2), 171-187.

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A.W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive
construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805.

Wittrock, C. M. (1994) Generative science teaching. In P. Fensham, R. Gunstone & R.
White (Eds.), The Content of Science: A Constructivist Approach to Teaching and Learning.
London: Falmer Press.

Woodward, C., & Woodward N. (1998). Welsh primary school leavers’ perceptions of
science. Research in Science & Technological Education, 16(1), 43-52.
Woolnough, B.E. (1990). Making choices. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Department of
Educational Studies.

Youngman, M. B. (1979). Analysing social and educational research data. London: McGraw
Hill.
Published
2018-01-22