Change, Challenge, Transformation: A Qualitative Inquiry into Transformative Teacher Learning
Abstract
In its essence, transformative learning is a dynamic and ever-emerging process, according to the core literature that deals with it. As such, when examined from the perspective of teacher professional development, transformative learning ceases being solely related to an individual and becomes a composition within which the individual creates and expands forms that need change. Thus, teacher learning that focuses only on new technology, methodology, and classroom management remains informative and valuable, but without a transformative character. This paper explores the underpinning principles of transformative learning by observing the notions of transformative change from the perspective of two non-traditional schools: one in Hungary and the other in Portugal. As such, the analysis and conclusions are formed using the data collected
through a qualitative inquiry of teachers and principals from the two selected schools. The results suggest that teacher transformative learning in the two specific settings is intimately related to the awareness and need
of change in education provisions, as well as with the challenges that this change brings. The gathered insights pave a way to a better understanding of the intricate and delicate tapestry of teacher learning in occasions in
which it embraces an everlasting reflective and transformative character.
Downloads
References
Bakkenes, I., Vermunt, J. D., & Wubbels, T. (2010). Teacher learning in the context of educational innovation: Learning activities and learning outcomes of experienced teachers. Learning and Instruction, 20(6), 533–548. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.09.001
Cervinkova, H., & Kalman, O. (2016). European doctorate in teacher education. Forum Oświatowe, 28(2), 10. Retrieved from http://www.edite.eu/
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249–305. doi:10.2307/1167272
Day, C., Sammons, P., Hopkins, D., Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Gu, Q., … Kington, A. (2009). The impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes final report. Nottingham: University of Nottingham. Retrieved from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/11329/1/DCSF-RR108.pdf
Echazarra, A., Salinas, D., Méndez, I., Denis, V., & Rech, G. (2016). How teachers teach and students learn: Successful strategies for school. OECD Education Working Papers No. 130. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jm29kpt0xxx-en
Ellström, P.-E. (2001). Integrating learning and work: Problems and prospects. Human Resource Development Quarterly Winter, 12(4), 421–435. Retrieved from https://www.mah.se/PageFiles/41319/Ellström 2001.pdf
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: an activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit. Retrieved from http://lchc.ucsd.edu/mca/Paper/Engestrom/Learning-by-Expanding.pdf
Giles, C., & Hargreaves, A. (2006). The sustainability of innovative schools as learning organizations and professional learning communities during standardized reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 124–156. doi:10.1177/0013161X05278189
Gregorzewski, M., & Kovacs, H. (2017). A mix that works for school development: School leadership and knowledge shariNG. In L. Rasiński, T. Tóth, & J. Wagner (Eds.), European perspectives in transformative education (pp. 204–215). Wroclaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Dolnośląskiej Szkoły Wyższej we Wrocławiu.
Halász, G. (2003). Educational change and social transition in Hungary. In E. Polyzoi, M. Fullan, & J. P. Anchan (Eds.), Change forces in post-communist eastern Europe: Education in transition (pp. 55–73). London, UK, & New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
Halász, G. (2015). Education and social transformation in central and eastern Europe. European Journal of Education, 50(3), 350–371. doi:10.1111/ejed.12130
Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Bransford, J., Berliner, D., Cochran-Smith, M., McDonald, M., & Zeicher, K. (2007). How teachers learn and develop. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 358–389). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Retrieved from https://psugtep.pbworks.com/f/PreparingTeachers for a Changing World.pdf
Hargreaves, A., Halász, G., & Pont, B. (2007). School leadership for systemic improvement in Finland: A case study report for the OECD activity Improving school leadership. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/edu/school/39928629.pdf
Horvath, L., Verderber, E., & Barath, T. (2015). Managing the complex adaptive learning organization. Contemporary Educational Leadership, 2(3), 61–83. Retrieved from http://www.cel.journal.uj.edu.pl/documents/61921109/135013678/Horvath%2C+Verderber%2C+Barath+%28nr+3+w+2015%2C+s.+61-83%29.pdf/620dd8bb-7418-479b-90a9-1e8cede8927b
James, C. (2010). The psychodynamics of educational change. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change (pp. 47–64). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Jarvis, P. (2006). Towards a comprehensive theory of human learning. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
Jarvis, P. (2009). Learning to be a person in the society: Learning to be me. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theoriests - In their own words. London, UK, & New York, NY: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
Kegan, R. (2009). What ‘form’ transfroms? A constructive-developmental approach to transfomrative learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theoriests - In their own words (pp. 35–52). London, UK, & New York, NY: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
Kovacs, H., & Tinoca, L. (2017). Unfreeze the pedagogies: introduction of a new innovative measure in Portugal. Revista Tempos e Espaços Em Educação, 10(23), 73–86.http://doi.org/10.20952/revtee.v10i23.7446
McCharen, B., Song, J., & Martens, J. (2011). School innovation: The mutual impacts of organizational learning and creativity. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39(6), 676–694. doi:10.1177/1741143211416387
Mezirow, J. (2009). An overview on transformative learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theoriests – In their own words (pp. 90–105). London, UK, & New York, NY: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
Ministry of Education and Culture. (2008). Education in Hungary past, present, future – an overview. Budapest: Department for EU Relations.
Resnick, L. B., Goldman, P., Spillane, J. P., & Rangel, E. S. (2010). Implementing innovation: From visionary models to everyday practice. In H. Dumont, D. Istance, F. Benavides (Eds.), The Nature of learning: Using Research to Inspire Practice (pp. 285–315). Paris: OECD. doi:10.1787/9789264086487-14-en
Roldão, M. C. (2003). Strategies to promote good practice and innovation in schools – The Portuguese case. In OECD (Ed.), Networks of innovation: Towards new models for managing schools and systems (pp. 87–97). Paris: OECD Publishing.
Schleicher, A. (2015). Schools for 21st-century learners. Paris: OECD Publishing.
doi:10.1787/9789264231191-en
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday.
Snyder, J., Bolin, F., & Zumwait, K. (1992). Curriculum implementation. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 402–435). New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Talbert, J. E. (2010). Professional learning communities at the crossroads: How systems hinder or engender change. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change (pp. 555–571). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:http://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2660-6_32
Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration. Iterative Best Evidence Synthesis Programme. Wellington: Ministry of Education. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7984.2007.00116.x
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.