Equality of Opportunity, Cultural Diversity and Claims for Fairness
Abstract
The present paper examines some of the tensions, problems and challenges associated with claims for equality of opportunity (the fairness argument). The introductory part identifies three separate forms of justification for public education, including the argument associated with equality of opportunity. Part II examines in detail two questions that reveal part of the anatomy of equality of opportunity: (1) what an opportunity is, and (2) when individuals’ opportunities are equal. This is followed by a presentation of the two basic principles of equality of opportunity: (1) the principle of non-discrimination, and (2) the “levelling the playing field†principle. The next part takes up the multiculturalist hypothesis advanced by minority groups for the accommodation and recognition of cultural diversity. This is followed by the identification of a set of claims comprising the “fairness argumentâ€. The last section focuses on the “currency problem†associated with cultural diversity as a form of “unfair disadvantageâ€. Part V examines two of the major shortcomings associated with the multicultural conception of equality of opportunity, while the concluding part discusses some of the questions that must be answered by any conception of equal opportunities.
Downloads
References
Barry, B. (2001). Culture and Equality. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Barry, B. (2005). Why Social Justice Matters. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bowie, N. E. (Ed.) (1988). Equal Opportunity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Cavanagh, M. (2002). Against Equality of Opportunity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clayton, M. (2001). Rawls and Natural Aristocracy, Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 1(3), 239–259.
Fishkin, J. (1983). Justice, Equal Opportunity, and the Family. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Frankel, C. (1971). Equality of Opportunity, Ethics, 81(3), 191–211.
Friedman, M., & Friedman, R. (1980). Free to Choose: A Personal Statement. London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Goldman, A. (1987). The Justification of Equal Opportunity, Social Philosophy and Policy, 5(1), 88–103.
Hansson, S. O. (2004). What are Opportunities and Why Should They be Equal, Social Choice and Welfare, 22(2), 305–316.
Holtug, N. (2008). Equality and Difference-Blind Rights. In N. Holtug, K. Lippert-Rasmussen, & S. Laegaard (Eds.), Nationalism and Multiculturalism in a World of Immigration (pp. 81–118). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Holtug, N., Lippert-Rasmussen, K., & Laegaard, S. (Eds.) (2008). Nationalism and Multiculturalism in a World of Immigration. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jacobs, L. A. (2004). Pursuing Equal Opportunities: The Theory and Practice of Egalitarian Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kymlicka, W. (1989). Liberalism, Community and Culture. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kymlicka, W., & Banting, K. (Eds.) (2006). Multiculturalism and the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
LukÅ¡iÄ Hacin, M., & Toplak, K. (2012). Teoretizacija multikulturalizma in etniÄne ekonomije v luÄi ohranjanja kulturne dediÅ¡Äine med migranti, Dve domovini, (35), 107–117.
Mason, A. (2006). Levelling the Playing Field. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Modood, T. (2007). Multiculturalism: A Civic Perspective. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Nagel, T. (1979). Mortal Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Parekh, B. (2000). Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. New York: Palgrave.
Pojman, L. P., & Westmoreland, R. (Eds.) (1997). Equality: Selected Readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Harvard.
Roemer, J. E. (1998). Equality of Opportunity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
SardoÄ, M. (2013a). Enake [izobraževalne] možnosti in družbena neenakost, Sodobna pedagogika, 64(2), 48– 62.
SardoÄ, M. (2013b). Anatomija enakih možnosti, Å olsko polje, XXIV(5/6), 145– 159.
Scanlon, T. M. (2003). The Difficulty of Tolerance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schaar, H. J. (1997 [1967]). Equality of Opportunity, and Beyond. In L. P. Pojman & R. Westmoreland (Eds.), Equality: Selected Readings (pp. 137–147). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scheffler, S. (2003). What is Egalitarianism? Philosophy and Public Affairs, 31(1), 5–39.
Scheffler, S. (2005). Choice, Circumstance, and the Value of Equality? Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 4(5), 5–28.
Segall, S. (2008). Health, Luck and Justice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sher, G. (1988). Qualifications, Fairness, and Desert. In N. E. Bowie (Ed.), Equal Opportunity (pp. 113–127). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Squires, J. (2006). Equality and Difference. In J. S. Dryzek, B. Honig & A. Phillips (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory (pp. 470–487). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swift, A. (2001). Political Philosophy: A Beginner’s Guide for Students and Politicians. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Temkin, L. S. (1993). Inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Westen, P. (1997 [1985]). The Concept of Equal Opportunity. In L. P. Pojman & R. Westmoreland (Eds.), Equality: Selected Readings (pp. 158–167). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.