Factors Affecting Success in Solving a Stand-Alone Geometrical Problem by Students aged 14 to 15

  • Branka Antunović-Piton Faculty of Educational Sciences, Juraj Dobrila University of Pula, Croatia
  • Nives Baranović Department of Teacher Education, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences University of Split
Keywords: geometrical problem, mathematic language, problem solving, visualisation

Abstract

This paper investigates and considers factors that affect success in solving a stand-alone geometrical problem by 182 students of the 7th and 8th grades of elementary school. The starting point for consideration is a geometrical task from the National Secondary School Leaving Exam in Croatia (State Matura), utilising elementary-level geometry concepts. The task was presented as a textual problem with an appropriate drawing and a task within a given context. After data processing, the key factors affecting the process of problem solving were singled out: visualisation skills, detection and connection of concepts, symbolic notations, and problem-solving culture. The obtained results are the basis of suggestions for changes in the geometry teaching-learning process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 215–241. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024312321077

Baranović, N. (2019). Pre-service primary education teachers’ knowledge of relationships among quadrilaterals, In J. Milinković & Z. Kadelburg (Eds.), Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 112–127). Mathematical Society of Serbia.

Bingolbali, E. (2011). Multiple solutions to problems in mathematics teaching: Do teachers really value them? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n1.2

Boonen, A. J. H., Van Wesel, F., Jolles, J., & Van der Schoot, M. (2014). The role of visual representation type, spatial ability, and reading comprehension in word problem solving: An item-level analysis in elementary school children. International Journal of Educational Research, 68, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2014.08.001

Cavanagh, M. (2008). One secondary teacher’s use of problem-solving teaching approaches. In M. Goos, R. Brown & K. Makar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (Vol. 1, pp. 117–124). MERGA http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.507.6272

Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K. (2007). Metode istraživanja u obrazovanju [Research methods in education]. NAKLADA SLAP.

de Villiers, M. (1998). To teach definitions in geometry or teach to define? https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255605686

Dreyfus, T. (1991). On the status of visual reasoning in mathematics and mathematics education. In Proceedings of the fifteenth annual meeting of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 33–48). PME, Assisi.

Državna matura 2011/2012 – ljetni rok [State Matura 2011/2012 - Summer Assessment Term] (DM ljeto 2012) (2012). Nacionalni centar za vanjsko vrednovanje. https://www.ncvvo.hr/dm-2011-2012-ljetni-rok/

Duval, R. (1999). Representation, vision and visualisation: Cognitive functions in mathematical thinking. Basic issues for learning, In F. Hitt & M. Santos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st annual Meeting of the North American, Chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 3–26). PME.

Duval, R. (2000). Basic issues for research in mathematics education, Plenary. In T. Nakahara & M. Koyama (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th international conference for the psychology of mathematics education, 1 (pp. 55–69). PME, Hiroshima University.

Duval, R. (2014). Commentary: Linking epistemology and semi-cognitive modelling in visualization. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(1), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0565-8

Foong, P. Y. (2002). Using short open-ended mathematics questions to promote thinking and understanding. National Institute of Education, Singapore. http://math.unipa.it/~grim/SiFoong.PDF

Fujita, T., & Jones, K. (2007). Learners’ understanding of the definitions and hierarchical classification of quadrilaterals: Towards a theoretical framing. Research in Mathematics Education, 9(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794800008520167

Gal, H., & Linchevski, L. (2010). To see or not to see: Analysing difficulties in geometry from the perspective of visual perception. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(2), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9232-y

Hodnik Čadež, T., & Manfreda Kolar, V. (2018). Monitoring and guiding pupils’ problem solving, Magistra Iadertina, 12(2), 115–139. https://doi.org/10.15291/magistra.1493

Hsu, W.-M. (2013). Examining the types of mathematical tasks used to explore the mathematics instruction by elementary school teachers. Creative Education, 4(6), 396–404. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.46056

Klavir, R., & Gorodetsky, K. (2011). Features of creativity as expressed in the construction of new analogical problems by intellectually gifted students. Creative Education, 2(3), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2011.23023

Klavir, R., & Hershkovitz, S. (2008). Teaching and evaluating ‘open - ended’ problems. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 20(5), 23.

Kurnik, Z. (2000). Matematički zadatak [Mathematical task]. Matematika i škola, II(7), 51–58. https://mis.element.hr/fajli/545/07-02.pdf

Leikin, R., Lev, M. (2007). Multiple solution tasks as a magnifying glass for observation of mathematical creativity. In the Proceedings of the 3th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education. 3 (pp. 161–168 ). PME, Seoul.

MZOS [Ministry of Science, Education and Sports]. (2006). Nastavni plan i program za osnovnu školu [The educational plan and programme for elementary school]. Ministry of Science, Education and Sports.

Odluka o donošenju kurikuluma za nastavni predmet Matematike za osnovne škole i gimnazije u Republici Hrvatskoj [Decision on the adoption of the curriculum for the subject of Mathematics for elementary schools and gymnasiums in the Republic of Croatia]. (Odluka) (2019). Narodne novine 7/2019.

PISA 2012 Matematičke kompetencije za život [Mathematical Competencies for Life] (2013). Nacionalni centar za vanjsko vrednovanje.

Polya, G. (1966). Kako ću riješiti matematički zadatak [How to solve it]. Školska knjiga.

Presmeg, N. C. (2006). Research on visualisation in learning and teaching mathematics. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 205-235). Sense Publishers.

Presmeg, N. (2014). Contemplating visualisation as an epistemological learning tool in mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46, 151–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0561-z

Priručnik za stručne radne skupine koje izrađuju ispite državne mature s primjerima zadataka iz ispita na državnoj maturi [Handbook for professional working groups preparing state Matura examinations with examples of tasks from the state Matura exam] (Priručnik DM). (2017). Nacionalni centar za vanjsko vrednovanje.

Priručnik za unapređivanje nastave matematike s primjerima zadataka iz međunarodnog istraživanja TIMSS 2015 [Handbook for the advancement of teaching mathematics with examples of tasks from TIMSS 2015] (Priručnik TIMSS). (2017). Nacionalni centar za vanjsko vrednovanje.

Rellensmann, J., Schukajlow, S., & Leopold, C. (2017). Make a drawing. Effects of strategic knowledge, drawing accuracy, and type of drawing on students’ mathematical modelling performance. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 95(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9736-1

Schukajlow, S., Leiss, D., Pekrun, R., Blum, W., Müller, M., & Messner, R. (2012). Teaching methods for modelling problems and students’ task-specific enjoyment, value, interest and self-efficacy expectations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(2), 215–237. https://doi-org.nukweb.nuk.uni-lj.si/10.1007/s10649-011-9341-2

Sinclair N., Moss J., Hawes Z., Stephenson C. (2018). Learning through and from drawing in early years geometry. In K. Mix, & M. Battista (Eds), Visualizing mathematics. Research in mathematics education. (pp. 229–252). Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98767-5

Sullivan, P. (2009). Constraints and opportunities when using content-specific open-ended tasks. In R. Hunter, B. Bicknell, & T. Burgess (Eds.), Crossing divides: Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia, 1 (pp. 726–729). MERGA. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.544.9781&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Van Hiele, P. M. (1986). Structure and insight: A theory of mathematics education. Academic Press.

Yang, K. L., & Li, J. L. (2018). A framework for assessing reading comprehension of geometric construction texts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(1), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9770-6

Yanhui, X. (2018). On “one problem multiple change” in Chinese “Bianshi” mathematics teaching. Teaching of Mathematics, 21(2), 80. http://www.teaching.math.rs/vol/tm2123.pdf

Published
2021-06-05