The Impact of External Contextual Factors on Teaching Candidates
Abstract
The formation of a teacher’s identity is considered a dynamic process influenced by internal and external contextual factors. This article explores the impact that external contextual factors have on teacher candidates’ identities by presenting the findings of an empirical qualitative study that investigated the relationship between teacher candidates’ beliefs and their demonstrations and representations of teaching and learning on a nationally standardised portfolio assessment. Metaphor analysis and stimulated recall were used to explore this relationship. The study found that teacher candidates’ teaching demonstrations while student teaching and representations of teaching found in a nationally standardised portfolio assessment were severely constrained by cooperating teachers and scripted curriculums. However, the study also found that candidates could articulate the differences between their beliefs about teaching and learning and their demonstrations and representations of teaching and learning. Candidates routinely made suggestions in the portfolio assessment to align their future teaching more closely to their metaphors for teaching. The study concluded that candidates did not change their beliefs but took up temporary teaching identities based on these findings. They found ways to navigate the assessment and their (teaching) context while remaining committed to their teaching identity and beliefs about good teaching. This article suggests how education system contexts impact the formation of teacher candidates’ identities and what teacher education programmes need to do to strengthen candidates’ identities in the face of negative external influences.
Downloads
References
Adair-Hauck, B., & Donato, R. (2002). The PACE model: A story-based approach to meaning and form for standards-based language learning. The French Review, 76(2), 265–276.
Ahmed, K. S. (2019). Against the script with edTPA: Preservice teachers utilise performance assessment to teach outside scripted curriculum. Urban Education, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085919873689
Alger, C. L. (2009). Secondary teachers’ conceptual metaphors of teaching and learning: Changes over the career span. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 743–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.10.004
Anderson, L., & Stillman, J. (2013). Making learning the object: Using cultural historical activity theory to analyze and organize student teaching in urban high-needs schools. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–36.
Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640902902252
Borg, S. (2018). Teachers’ beliefs and classroom practices. In P. Garrett & J. M. Cots (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language awareness (pp. 75–91). Routledge.
Britzman, D. P. (2003). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. (Rev. ed.). State University of New York.
Buehl, M. M., & Beck, J. S. (2014). The relationship between teachers’ beliefs and teachers’ practices. In H. Fives & M. Gregoire Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs (pp. 74–91). Routledge.
Burke, K. (1945). A grammar of motives. Prentice-Hall.
Clarke, A., Triggs, V., & Nielsen, W. (2014). Cooperating teacher participation in teacher education: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 84(2), 163–202. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313499618
Cohen, N. H., & Galbraith, M. W. (1995). Mentoring in the learning society. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 66, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.36719956603
Cuenca, A. (2011). The role of legitimacy in student teaching: Learning to “feel†like a teacher. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(2), 117–131. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23479696
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105285962
Dempsey, N. P. (2010). Stimulated recall interviews in ethnography. Qualitative Sociology, 33(3), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-010-9157-x
edTPA. (n.d). About edTPA. edTPA http://www.edtpa.com/pageview.aspx?f=gen_aboutedtpa.html
Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2008). What do teachers believe? Developing a framework for examining beliefs about teachers’ knowledge and ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 134–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.01.001
Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2012). Spring cleaning for the ‘messy’ construct of teachers’ beliefs: What are they? Which have been examined? What can they tell us? In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, J. M. Royer, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Vol. 2. Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors (pp. 471–499). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13274-019
Grossman, P. L., Smagorinsky, P., & Valencia, S. (1999). Appropriating tools for teaching English: A theoretical framework for research on learning to teach. American Journal of Education, 108(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1086/444230
Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. W. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100.
Gurney, B. F. (1995). Tugboats and tennis games: Conceptions of teaching and learning revealed through metaphors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(6), 569–583.
Hammerness, K. (2006). Seeing through teachers’ eyes: Professional ideals and classroom practice. Teachers College Press.
Krashen, S. (1992). The input hypothesis: An update. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University round table on languages and linguistics (GURT) 1991: Linguistics and language pedagogy: The state of the art. (pp. 409–431). Georgetown University Press.
Marland, P., & Osborne, J. (1990). Classroom theory, thinking, and action. Teaching & Teacher Education, 6(1), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(90)90010-3
Munby, H. (1984). A qualitative approach to the study of a teacher’s beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660210104
Munby, H. (1986). Metaphor in the thinking of teachers: An exploratory study. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 18(2), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027860180209
Munby, H. (1987). Metaphor and teachers’ knowledge. Research in the Teaching of English, 21(4), 377–385. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40171124
Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027870190403
O’Brien, J. (1993). Action research through stimulated recall. Research in science education, 23(1), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357063
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
Richardson, V., & Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 905–947). American Educational Research Association.
Saban, A., Koçbeker, B. N., & Saban, A. (2006). An investigation of the concept of teacher among prospective teachers through metaphor analysis. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 6(2), 509–522.
Saldaña, J. (2014). Thinking qualitatively: Methods of mind. Sage Publications.
Smagorinsky, P., Cook, L. S., Moore, C., Jackson, A. Y., & Fry, P. G. (2004). Tensions in learning to teach: Accommodation and the development of a teaching identity. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(1), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487103260067
Smith, E. R. (2007). Negotiating power and pedagogy in student teaching: Expanding and shifting roles in expert–novice discourse. Mentoring & Tutoring, 15(1), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260601037405
Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analysing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
Tillema, H. (2000). Belief change towards self-directed learning in student teachers immersion in practice or reflection on action. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5-6), 575–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00016-0
Thomas, L., & Beauchamp, C. (2011). Understanding new teachers’ professional identities through metaphor. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 762–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.12.007
Treadwell, S. M., Cameron, J. L., & Manson, M. (2017). edTPA and physical education: Tips for success for all stakeholders. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 88(5), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2017.1294511
Tuckwell, N. B. (1980). Stimulated recall: Theoretical perspectives and practical and technical considerations. University of Alberta.
Veal, M. L., & Rikard, L. (1998). Cooperating teachers’ perspectives on the student teaching triad. Journal of Teacher Education, 49(2), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487198049002004
Walkington, J. (2005). Becoming a teacher: Encouraging development of teacher identity through reflective practice. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866052000341124
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge University Press.
In order to ensure both the widest dissemination and protection of material published in CEPS Journal, we ask Authors to transfer to the Publisher (Faculty of Education, University of Ljubljana) the rights of copyright in the Articles they contribute. This enables the Publisher to ensure protection against infringement.
