Policy and Prediction: The Case of Institutional Diversity in Romanian Higher Education

  • Lazăr Vlăsceanu
  • Marian-Gabriel Hâncean

Abstract

Presenting key elements of post-1990 historical developments in the Romanian higher education system, the emphasis is put on recent (2011) policies of increasing higher education institutional differentiation. The view is that, in policy design, due attention should be paid to both historical roots and predicted developments. Building on an institutional analysis approach, we put forward a theoretical model that aims to explore the predictive implications of some recently promoted higher education policies. These policies are expected to increase institutional differentiation at the systemic level and enhance quality in teaching and research at university level. The predictive capacity of a model of reference is tested against a concurrent model. The key assumption of the latter is that of considering higher education institutions (HEIs) as “cooperative systems” that are unable to generate those outputs and  outcomes that, by aggregation, would contribute to the construction of an institutionally diverse and heterogeneous higher education landscape. 

References

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and
Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.

Meyer, H.-D., & Rowan, B. (2006). The New Institutionalism in Education. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Mintzberg, H. (1993). Structure in Fives. Designing Effective Organizations. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Păunescu, M., Florian, B., & Hâncean, M.-G. (2012). Internalizing Quality Assurance in Higher
Education: Challenges of Transition in Enhancing the Institutional Responsibility for Quality. In A. Curaj, P. Scott, L. Vlăsceanu, & L. Wilson, European Higher Education at the Crossroads (pp. 317-338). Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London: Springer .

Păunescu, M., Miroiu, A., & Vlăsceanu, L. (2011). Calitatea învăţământului superior din România.
Iaşi: Polirom.

Pfeffer, J. (1995). Incentives in Organizations: The Importance of Social Relations. In O. E.
Williamson, Organization Theory. From Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond (pp. 72-97). New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Reichert, S. (2009). Institutional Diversity in European Higher Education. Brussels: EUA.

Scott, R. W. (2003). Organizations as Rational, Natural and Open Systems. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Taylor, J., & Miroiu, A. (2002). Policy-Making, Strategic Planning, and Management of Higher
Education. Bucharest: CEPES.

van Vught, F. A. (2008). Mission Diversity and Reputation in Higher Education. Higher Education
Policy, 21(2), 151-174.

Vlăsceanu, L. (2010). Universities and Reflexive Modernity. Budapest & New York: Central European University Press.

Vlăsceanu, L., Miroiu, A., Păunescu, M., & Hâncean, M.-G. (2011). Starea calităţii în învăţământul
superior. Barometrul Calităţii 2010. Braşov: Editura Universităţii Transilvania.
Published
2012-12-31
How to Cite
VLĂSCEANU, Lazăr; HÂNCEAN, Marian-Gabriel. Policy and Prediction: The Case of Institutional Diversity in Romanian Higher Education. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, [S.l.], v. 2, n. 4, p. 53-70, dec. 2012. ISSN 2232-2647. Available at: <https://ojs.cepsj.si/index.php/cepsj/article/view/336>. Date accessed: 21 mar. 2019.