The Benefits of Fine Art Integration into Mathematics in Primary School
Keywords:
primary school education, integration, fine art, mathematics, creativity
Abstract
The main purpose of the article is to research the effects of the integration of fine art content into mathematics on students at the primary school level. The theoretical part consists of the definition of arts integration into education, a discussion of the developmental process of creative mathematical thinking, an explanation of the position of art and mathematics in education today, and a summary of the benefits of arts integration and its positive effects on students. The empirical part reports on the findings of a pedagogical experiment involving two different ways of teaching fifth-grade students: the control group was taught mathematics in a traditional way, while the experimental group was taught with the integration of fine art content into the mathematics lessons. At the end of the teaching periods, four mathematics tests were administered in order to determine the difference in knowledge between the control group and the experimental group. The results of our study confirmed the hypotheses, as we found positive effects of fine art integration into mathematics, with the experimental group achieving higher marks in the mathematics tests than the control group. Our results are consistent with the findings of previous research and studies, which have demonstrated and confirmed that long-term participation in fine art activities offers advantages related to mathematical reasoning, such as intrinsic motivation, visual imagination and reflection on how to generate creative ideas.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Arts Integration Three Variations (n.d.). Retrieved 02.03.2015 from http://www.middleweb.com/wpcontent/uploads/2013/03/arts-integration-three-variations.jpg
Bahn, P. G. (1998). The Cambridge Illustrated History of Prehistoric Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barnes - Svarney, P. (2006). The Handy Math Answer Book. Detroit: Visible Ink Press.
Barone, T. (2001). Touching Eternity: The Enduring Outcomes of Teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.
Berlinghoff, W. P., & Gouvea, F. Q. (2008). Matematika skozi stoletja. Ljubljana: Modrijan.
Bristow, J., Cowley, P., & Daines, B. (2001). Spomin in uÄenje. Ljubljana: Educy.
Burnaford, G. E. (2013). Renaissance in the classroom: Arts integration and meaningful learning. Mahwah, N.J: L. Erlbaum.
Burton, J., Horowitz, R., & Abeles, H. (1999). Learning in and through the arts: Curriculum implications. In Champions of change: The impact of the arts on learning (pp. 35–46). Columbia:
Columbia University.
Catterall, J. S. (2002). The arts and the transfer of learning. In R. J. Deasy (Ed.), Critical links: Learning in the arts and student academic and social development (pp. 151–157). Washington: Arts Education Partnership.
Chapman, R. (1998). The Arts Improve Student Performance. Education Digest, 63(8), 58–60.
DaSilva, K. E. (2000). Art in Your Curriculum “From Words to Imagesâ€. Teaching Pre K 8, 31, 40–43.
Davis, J. H. (2008). Why our schools need the arts. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Putnam.
Dissanayake, E. (1995). Homo aestheticus. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Efland, A. (1990). A history of art education: Intellectual and social currents in teaching the visual arts. New York: Teachers College Press.
Eisner, E. (2001). Should we create new aims for art education? Art Education, 54(5), 6–10.
Elster, A. (2001). Learning Through the ArtsTM: Program Goals, Features and Pilot Results. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 2(7).
Fiske. E. B. (1999). Champions of Change: The Impact of the Arts on Learning. Retrieved 11.05.2014 from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED435581
Friedman, T. (2010). Newspaper interview, Tucker Marc. New York Times (OpEd), 4 August 2010.
Gardner, H. (1973). The arts and human development: A psychological study of the artistic process. New York: Wiley & Sons.
Gardner, H., & Kleiner, F. S. (2014). Gardner’s art through the ages: The Western perspective. Boston, MA: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.
Gelineau, R. P. (2012). Integrating the arts across the elementary school curriculum. Belmont CA: Wadsworth.
Giaquinto, M. (2007). Visual Thinking in Mathematics; An Epistemological Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the Imagination: Essays on Education, the Arts, and Social Change. New York: Teachers College Press.
Guerrero, J. S. (2004). Learning Math through Visual Art and Hands on Projects. Spring Valley: Xlibris Corporation.
Gustlin, D. Z. (2012). Why Can’t We Paint in Math Class? Integrating Art into the Core Curriculum: masterclass work. Gainesville: [Gustlin, D. Z.].
Hetland, L., Winner, E., Veenema, S., & Sheridan, K. (2007). Studio thinking: The real benefits of visual arts education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Learning Through the Arts, Royal Conservatory of Music - Learning (n.d.). Retrieved 30.04.2015 from http://learning.rcmusic.ca/ltta
Peterson, I. (23 December 2000). Visions of Infinity Tiling a hyperbolic floor inspires both mathematics and art. Science News Washington, 158, 408–410.
Pitman, W. (1998). Learning the arts in an age of uncertainty. Toronto: Arts Education Council of Ontario.
Posner, M., Rothbart, M. K., Sheese B. E., & Kieras, J. (2008). How Arts Training Influences Cognition. Learning, Arts and the Brain. The Dana Consortium Report on Arts and Cognition. New York: Dana Press.
Root - Bernstein, M. M., & Root - Bernstein, R. S. (2013). Sparks of genius: The thirteen thinking tools of the world’s most creative people. Boston, Mass: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
SIGGRAPH. (1989). Computer art in context: SIGGRAPH’89 art show catalog. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Silverstein L. B., & Layne S. (2010). Defining Arts Integration. Retrieved 15.09.2014 from http://www.kenndy-center.org/education/partners/defimimg_arts_integration.pdf
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]: Cambridge University Press.
Sylvester, R. (1998). Art for the brain’s sake. Educational Leadership, 56(3), 31–35.
Vagianos, A. (1999). Professional development and training for teachers and artists. A preliminary proposal for a Laidlaw Foundation arts education program. Unpublished manuscript. Laidlaw Foundation, 365 Bloor Street East, Suite 2000, Toronto, ON M4W 3L4.
Ward, R. A. (2012). Math Art Fun: Activities for Discovering Mathematical Magic in Modern Art. Houston: Bright Sky Press.
Bahn, P. G. (1998). The Cambridge Illustrated History of Prehistoric Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barnes - Svarney, P. (2006). The Handy Math Answer Book. Detroit: Visible Ink Press.
Barone, T. (2001). Touching Eternity: The Enduring Outcomes of Teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.
Berlinghoff, W. P., & Gouvea, F. Q. (2008). Matematika skozi stoletja. Ljubljana: Modrijan.
Bristow, J., Cowley, P., & Daines, B. (2001). Spomin in uÄenje. Ljubljana: Educy.
Burnaford, G. E. (2013). Renaissance in the classroom: Arts integration and meaningful learning. Mahwah, N.J: L. Erlbaum.
Burton, J., Horowitz, R., & Abeles, H. (1999). Learning in and through the arts: Curriculum implications. In Champions of change: The impact of the arts on learning (pp. 35–46). Columbia:
Columbia University.
Catterall, J. S. (2002). The arts and the transfer of learning. In R. J. Deasy (Ed.), Critical links: Learning in the arts and student academic and social development (pp. 151–157). Washington: Arts Education Partnership.
Chapman, R. (1998). The Arts Improve Student Performance. Education Digest, 63(8), 58–60.
DaSilva, K. E. (2000). Art in Your Curriculum “From Words to Imagesâ€. Teaching Pre K 8, 31, 40–43.
Davis, J. H. (2008). Why our schools need the arts. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Putnam.
Dissanayake, E. (1995). Homo aestheticus. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Efland, A. (1990). A history of art education: Intellectual and social currents in teaching the visual arts. New York: Teachers College Press.
Eisner, E. (2001). Should we create new aims for art education? Art Education, 54(5), 6–10.
Elster, A. (2001). Learning Through the ArtsTM: Program Goals, Features and Pilot Results. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 2(7).
Fiske. E. B. (1999). Champions of Change: The Impact of the Arts on Learning. Retrieved 11.05.2014 from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED435581
Friedman, T. (2010). Newspaper interview, Tucker Marc. New York Times (OpEd), 4 August 2010.
Gardner, H. (1973). The arts and human development: A psychological study of the artistic process. New York: Wiley & Sons.
Gardner, H., & Kleiner, F. S. (2014). Gardner’s art through the ages: The Western perspective. Boston, MA: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.
Gelineau, R. P. (2012). Integrating the arts across the elementary school curriculum. Belmont CA: Wadsworth.
Giaquinto, M. (2007). Visual Thinking in Mathematics; An Epistemological Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the Imagination: Essays on Education, the Arts, and Social Change. New York: Teachers College Press.
Guerrero, J. S. (2004). Learning Math through Visual Art and Hands on Projects. Spring Valley: Xlibris Corporation.
Gustlin, D. Z. (2012). Why Can’t We Paint in Math Class? Integrating Art into the Core Curriculum: masterclass work. Gainesville: [Gustlin, D. Z.].
Hetland, L., Winner, E., Veenema, S., & Sheridan, K. (2007). Studio thinking: The real benefits of visual arts education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Learning Through the Arts, Royal Conservatory of Music - Learning (n.d.). Retrieved 30.04.2015 from http://learning.rcmusic.ca/ltta
Peterson, I. (23 December 2000). Visions of Infinity Tiling a hyperbolic floor inspires both mathematics and art. Science News Washington, 158, 408–410.
Pitman, W. (1998). Learning the arts in an age of uncertainty. Toronto: Arts Education Council of Ontario.
Posner, M., Rothbart, M. K., Sheese B. E., & Kieras, J. (2008). How Arts Training Influences Cognition. Learning, Arts and the Brain. The Dana Consortium Report on Arts and Cognition. New York: Dana Press.
Root - Bernstein, M. M., & Root - Bernstein, R. S. (2013). Sparks of genius: The thirteen thinking tools of the world’s most creative people. Boston, Mass: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
SIGGRAPH. (1989). Computer art in context: SIGGRAPH’89 art show catalog. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Silverstein L. B., & Layne S. (2010). Defining Arts Integration. Retrieved 15.09.2014 from http://www.kenndy-center.org/education/partners/defimimg_arts_integration.pdf
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]: Cambridge University Press.
Sylvester, R. (1998). Art for the brain’s sake. Educational Leadership, 56(3), 31–35.
Vagianos, A. (1999). Professional development and training for teachers and artists. A preliminary proposal for a Laidlaw Foundation arts education program. Unpublished manuscript. Laidlaw Foundation, 365 Bloor Street East, Suite 2000, Toronto, ON M4W 3L4.
Ward, R. A. (2012). Math Art Fun: Activities for Discovering Mathematical Magic in Modern Art. Houston: Bright Sky Press.
Published
2015-09-30
How to Cite
Brezovnik, A. (2015). The Benefits of Fine Art Integration into Mathematics in Primary School. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 5(3), 11–32. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.125
Section
FOCUS
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
