Velikih pet dejavnikov osebnostnih lastnosti in prakse vodenja predstojnikov fakultetnih oddelkov: napovedna študija
Povzetek
Ta študija je ugotavljala, ali lahko velikih pet dejavnikov osebnostnih lastnosti napoveduje prakse vodenja pri predstojnikih fakultetnih oddelkov. Študija je imela napovedni raziskovalni načrt; podatki so bili zbrani prek 424 udeležencev v študijskem letu 2023, instrumenta te študije pa sta bila dva vprašalnika. Študija je pokazala, da velikih pet dejavnikov osebnostnih lastnosti napoveduje prakse vodenja predstojnikov fakultetnih oddelkov. Dva dejavnika osebnostnih lastnosti, tj. vestnost in odprtost za izkušnje, sta bila statistično značilna in sta napovedovala prakse pri zglednem vodenju. Štirje dejavniki (prijetnost, vestnost, odprtost za izkušnje in ekstravertnost) so bili statistično značilni in so napovedovali prakse vodenja pri navdihovanju skupne vizije. Trije dejavniki (nevroticizem, ekstravertiranost in vestnost) so bili statistično značilni in so napovedovali prakse vodenja pri preizpraševanju procesov. Dva dejavnika (vestnost in odprtost za izkušnje) sta bila statistično značilna in sta napovedovala prakse vodenja, ki omogočajo drugim, da ukrepajo. Trije dejavniki (vestnost, prijetnost in odprtost za izkušnje) so bili statistično značilni in so napovedovali vodstvene prakse spodbujanja srčnosti. Študija je priporočila, da bi morali vodje fakultetnih oddelkov upoštevati osebnostne lastnosti kot pomembno dimenzijo pri izbiri in imenovanju predstojnikov teh oddelkov in drugih akademskih vodij na vseh ravneh v visokošolskih ustanovah.Prenosi
Literatura
Alkahtan, A., Abu-Jarad, I., & Sulaiman, M. (2011). The impact of personality and leadership styles on leading change capability of Malaysian Managers. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 1(2), 70–99. http://www.ajbmr.com/articlepdf/ajbmr_v01n02_06.pdf
Amelang, M., Herboth, G., & Oefner, I. (1991). A prototype strategy for the construction of a creativity scale. European Journal of Personality, 5(4), 261–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410050402
Antonakis, J., & Day, D. (2018). The nature of leadership. SAGE.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to research in education. Wadsworth.
Barrick, M., & Mount, M. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A metaanalysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.
Barrick, M. & Mount, M. (1993). Autonomy as a moderator of the relationship between the big five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 111–118.
Bass, B., & Bass, R. (2008). The Bass Handbook of leadership, theory research & managerial applications. Free Press.
Bennis, W., & Nanus, B. (2007). Leaders: the strategies for taking charge. Harper Business.
Blake, R., & McCanse, A. (1991). Leadership dilemmas-grid solutions. Gulf.
Blake, R., & Mouton, J. (1964). The managerial gird. Gulf.
Blake, R., & Mouton, J. (1978). The new managerial gird. Gulf.
Blake, R., & Mouton, J. (1985). The new managerial gird III. Gulf.
Bryman, A. (1992). Charisma and leadership in organizations. Sage.
Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. (1960). Group dynamics: Research and theory. Evanston, Row Peterson.
Costa, P. (1994, July). Work and personality: Use of the NEO PI-R in industrial/organizational psychology [Paper presentation]. International Congress of Applied Psychology 1994, Madrid, Spain.
Costa, P., & McCrae, R. (1985). The neo personality inventory manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
Costa, P., & McCrae, R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6), 653–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-I
Dinh, J., Lord, R., Gardner, W., Meuser, J., Liden, R., & Hu, J. (2014). Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 36–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.005
Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw Hill.
Gall, M., Gall, J., & Borg, R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction. Pearson Education.
George, J. (1996). Trait and state affect. In K. Murphy (Ed.), Individual differences and behavior (pp. 145–171). Jossey-Bass.
Gmelch, W. (2019). The call for department chair leadership: why chairs serve, what they do, how they develop, how long they serve, and is there life after chairing. International Journal of Leadership and Change, 7(1), 9–19. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/ijlc/vol7/iss1/1
Goldberg, L. (1990). An alternative description of personality: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.
Goldberg, L. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26–34.
Halpin, A. (1957). The observed leader behavior and ideal leader behavior of aircraft commanders and school superintendents. In R. M. Stogdill & A. E. Coons (Eds.), Leader behavior. Its description and measurement. Ohio State University: Bureau of Business Research.
Hemphill, J., & Coons, A. (1957). Development of the leader behavior description questionnaire. In R. M. Stogdill & A. E. Coons (Eds.), Leader behavior: Its description and measurement. Ohio State University: Bureau of Business Research.
Hemphill, J., Seigel, A., & Westie, C. (1951). An exploratory study of relations between perceptions of leader behavior, group characteristics, and expectations concerning the behavior of ideal leaders. Ohio State University: Personnel Research Board.
Hendrickson, R., Lane, J, Harris, J., & Dorman, R. (2013). Academic leadership and governance of higher education. Stylus.
Hughes, R., Ginnett, R., & Curphy, G. (2006). Leadership enhancing the lessons of experience. McGraw-Hill.
Jago, A. (1982). Leadership: Perspectives in theory and research. Management Science, 28(3), 315–336. John, O., Naumann, L., & Soto, C. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). Guilford.
Judge, T., Bono, J., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 765−780.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. Wiley.
Kirkpatrick, S., & Locke, E. (1991). Leadership: Do traits matter. The Executive, 5, 48–60.
Kouze, J., & Posner, P. (2007). The leadership challenge. Jossey-Bass.
Kouze, J., & Posner, P. (2012). The leadership challenge. Jossey-Bass.
Kouze, J., & Posner, P. (2017). LPI: Leadership practice inventory. https://2u.pw/zGdFN0q
Kouze, J., & Posner, P. (2017). The leadership challenge. Jossey-Bass.
Larsen, R., & Buss, D. (2017). Personality psychology: Domains of knowledge about human nature. McGraw Hill.
Likert, R. (1961). An emerging theory of organizations, leadership and management. In L. Petrullo & B. M. Bass (Eds.), Leadership and interpersonal behavior. Holt Rinehart & Winston.
Likert, R. (1967). The human organization. McGraw-Hill.
Mahdinezhad, M., Mansor, M., Rmbeli, N., Hashim, E., & Shahhosseini, M. (2018). Effective Academic Leadership: Key Aspects of Leader Behavior in Higher Education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(9), 657–665. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i9/4646
McCrae, R., & Costa, P. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.
Nadler, D., & Tushman, M. (2012). Leadership for organizational change. Jossey-Bass.
Northouse, P. (2010). Leadership: Theory and practice. SAGE.
Northouse, P. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice. SAGE.
Peabody, D., & Goldberg, L. (1989). Some determinants of factor structures from personality-trait descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 552–567.
Ryckman, R. (2008). Theories of personality. Thomson Wadsworth.
Simic, J., & Ristic, M. (2017). The Relationship between personality traits and managers leadership styles. European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research, 11(2), 195–200.
Siddique, M., Aslam, H., Khan, M., & Fatima, M. (2011). Impact of academic leadership on faculty’s motivation, and organizational effectiveness in higher education system. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(8), 184–191.
Solaja, O., Idowu, F., & James, A. (2016). Exploring the relationship between leadership communication style, personality traits and organizational productivity. Serbian Journal of Management, 11(1), 99–117.
Stogdill, R. (1963). Manual for the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire form XII. Ohio State University: Bureau of Business Research.
Stogdill, R. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. Free Press.
Tahiraj, I., & Krek, J. (2022). Organizational culture in public university: A case study in Kosovo. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 12(3), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1198
Vilkinas, T., Ladyshewsky, R., & Saebel, J. (2009). Academic leadership: building capacity. Learning and Change Teaching Council.
Warener, R. (2020). Applied Statistics I: Basic Bivariate Techniques. SAGE.
Williams, S. (1997). Personality and self-leadership. Human Resource Management Review, 7, 139–155.
Yahaya, N., Taib, M., Ismail, J., Shariff, Z., Yahaya, A., Boon, Y., & Hashim, S. (2011). Relationshi between leadership personality types and source of power and leadership styles among managers. African Journal of Business Management, 5(22), 9635–9648.
Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations. Pearson.
Zulfqar, A., Valcke, M., Quraishi, U., & Devos, G. (2021). Developing academic leaders: evaluation of a leadership development intervention in higher education. SAGE Open, 11(1), 1–15.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
