Young People with Complex Needs as a Particular Challenge for the Education System
Abstract
One of the phenomena that predicts poorer educational outcomes for young people, as well as poorer outcomes in other areas, is certainly the phenomenon of complex needs, i.e., challenges that cut across different domains, often combining psychosocial wellbeing, physical and mental health, socioeconomic background, the burden of different challenges on the young persons’ family, a non-dominant ethnic background, learning difficulties and other aspects. A key challenge with complex needs is the inability of systems (educational and others) to respond appropriately to them, resulting in young people being sent from door to door and being excluded, as well as other adverse responses for both parties (young people and services, educational and others). In order to understand the emergence of complex needs or multiple vulnerabilities, we need to analyse them using an intersectional perspective. In this paper, data from a national Slovenian study entitled Support Networks for Young People in Psychosocial Distress are analysed using a subsample of 32 young people from the overall sample of 203 interviewees. The subsample represents young people whose interviews show the greatest clustering of distress in various contexts of life. The interviews with the selected participants are qualitatively analysed using content analysis based on a scheme of key social systems: school/education, family, peer networks, local community and other (formal) support services. All of these systems are analysed in terms of being supportive or threatening according to the perception of the young person. In all of the systems, more threatening than supportive aspects were reported by young people with complex needs. An analysis of both kinds of factors can help us to think about the changes needed in educational and other systems in order to make them more responsive to the needs of particularly vulnerable young people.
Downloads
References
Beck, U. (2003). Kaj je globalizacija? [What is globalisation?]. Krtina.
Bjønness, S., Viksveen, P., Johannessen, J. O., & Storm, M. (2020). User participation and shared decision-making in adolescent mental healthcare: A qualitative study of healthcare professionals' perspectives. Child Adolescence Psychiatry Mental Health, 14(2), 2–9.
Cefai, C., & Cavioni, V. (2015). Beyond PISA: Schools as contexts for the promotion of children’s mental health and well-being. Contemporary School Psychology, 19, 4(2), 233–242.
Collishaw S. (2015). Annual research review: Secular trends in child and adolescent mental health. Journal Child Psychol Psychiatry, 56(3), 370–393.
Dekleva, B., Grbec, H., Klemenčič Rozman, M. M., Lah, A., Leskošek, V., Mikuš Kos, A., Polajžer, P., Rapuš-Pavel, J., Razpotnik, Š., Sande, M., Simić, S., & Tadič, D. (2021). Podporne mreže mladih v psihosocialnih stiskah (zaključno poročilo ciljnega raziskovalnega projekta) [Support networks of young people in psychosocial distress (final report of a target research project)]. University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Work; University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education. http://pefprints.pef.uni-lj.si/7047
Dekleva, B., Klemenčič Rozman, M. M., Razpotnik, Š., Sande, M., Škraban, J., & Tadič, D. (2018). Dostopnost organiziranih oblik podpore mladim v psihosocialnih in duševnih težavah in konteksti teh težav: preliminarna študija: Raziskovalno poročilo. [Accessibility of organised forms of support for young people in psychosocial distress and the contexts of those difficulties: Research Report]. University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education.
Demšar, M. (2021). Socialnopedagoška podpora družinam – med podporo in nadzorom [Socialpedagogical support for families: Between support and supervision] [Master’s thesis]. University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education.
De Vries, S., & Bouwkamp, R. (2002). Psihosocialna družinska terapija [Psychosocial family therapy]. Firis.
Featherstone, B. (2006). Rethinking family support in the current policy context. British Journal of Social Work, 36(1), 5–19.
Fjermestad, K. W., Wergeland, G. J., Rogde, A., Bjaastad, J. F., Heiervang, E., & Haugland, B. S. (2020). School-based targeted prevention compared to specialist mental health treatment for youth anxiety. Child and adolescent mental health, 25(2), 102–109.
Giddens, A. (1998). The third way: The renewal of social democracy. Polity Press.
Gomes, J. C., Silva, A. P. S. D., & Corradi-Webster, C. M. (2021). Revolving door in the care for children and adolescents drug users: Challenges and management. Psicologia & Sociedade, 33, Article e227932.
Grebenc, V., & Kvaternik, I. (2008). Vrzeli med medicino in socialnim delom: Primer “dvojnih diagnoz” [Gaps between medicine and social work: The case of “dual diagnoses”]. Teorija in praksa, 45(1/2), 129–143.
Gregorčič Mrvar, P., Kalin, J., Mažgon, J. Muršak, J., & Šteh, B. (2016). Skupnost in šola: vrata se odpirajo v obe smeri [Community and school: The doors open both ways.] Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani.
Herwig-Lempp, J. (2022). Systemische Sozialarbeit. Haltungen und Handeln in der Praxis. [Systemic social work. Attitudes and actions in practice]. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Jeriček Klanšček, H., Roškar, S., Vinko, M., Konec Juričič, N., Hočevar Grom, A., Bajt, M., Čuš, A., Furman, L., Zager Kocjan, G., Hafner, A., Medved, T., Floyd Bračič M., & Poldrugovac, M. (2018). Duševno zdravje otrok in mladostnikov v Sloveniji [Mental health of young people in Slovenia]. National Institute of Public Health of the Republic of Slovenia.
Klemenčič Mirazchiyski, E. (2017). Razvoj modela nacionalne mreže služb za duševno zdravje otrok in mladostnikov [Development of a model of a national network of child and adolescent mental health services]. CENTERKONTURA. URN:NBN:SI:DOC-DW22VOLY from http://www.dlib.si
Kreft Toman, I. (2017). Tveganja ob prehodu iz izvendružinske vzgoje v samostojnost [Risks during the transition from non-family education to independence]. Socialna pedagogika, 21(1/2), 55–72.
Kuhar, R. (2009). Na križiščih diskriminacije (večplastna in intersekcijska diskriminacija) [At the crossroads of discrimination (multifaceted and intersectional discrimination)]. Mirovni inštitut.
Lavrič, M., & Deželan, T. (2021). Mladina 2020: položaj mladih v Sloveniji [Youth 2020: The situation of young people in Slovenia]. Univerzitetna založba Univerze v Mariboru; Založba Univerze v Ljubljani.
Mešl, N., & Kodele, T. (2016). Co-creating desired outcomes and strengthening the resilience of multi-challenged families. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 6(4), 51–72.
Mikuš Kos, A. (2017). Duševno zdravje otrok današnjega časa [Mental health of children today]. Didakta.
Mladenović, A. (2016). Pomen intersekcionalnega pristopa pri obravnavi kompleksnih neenakosti [The importance of an intersectional approach in dealing with complex inequalities]. Šolsko Polje, 27(5/6), 219–220.
Mozère, L. (2007). What’s the trouble with identity? Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 7(2), 109–118.
Muijen, M. (2015). Mental Health Mission Slovenia, 19–21 April 2015. [Unpublished report]. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Slovenia.
Parton, N. (2006). Every child matters: The shift to prevention whilst strengthening protection in children’s services in England. Children and Youth Services Review, 28(8), 796–992.
Ramaekers, S. (2010). Pedagogy of the encounter? Philosophical notes on the idea of ‘meeting places’ as forms of parent support. Centre for Philosophy of Education.
Razpotnik, Š. (2004). Preseki odvečnosti: nevidne identitete mladih priseljenk v družbi tranzicijskih vic [Intersections of redundancy: The invisible identities of young immigrant women in a society of transition strife]. University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education.
Razpotnik, Š. (2007). Delovno mesto – ulica: brezdomci mlajše generacije, izključeni iz sfere dela [Workplace – The street: Homeless people of the younger generation, excluded from the sphere of work]. In B. Dekleva, J. Rapuš Pavel, & D. Zorc Maver (Eds.), Prehodi v svet dela – izbira ali nuja? [Transitions to the world of work – Choice or necessity?] (pp. 124–157). University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education.
Razpotnik, Š. (2011). It is all up to me: Access to education and the discourse of individual responsibility. Teorija in praksa: revija za družbena vprašanja, 48(5), 1446–1465.
Richardson, D., Patana, P., Pleace, N., Frey, V., & Ferraro, V. (2015). Integrating social services for vulnerable groups: Bridging sectors for better service delivery. OECD.
Rosanvallon, P. (1995). La nouvelle question sociale: repenser l’etat-providence [The new social question: Rethinking the welfare state]. Seuil.
Rupnik Vec, T., & Slivar, B. (2019). Vpliv različnih dejavnikov na doživljanje in znake stresa pri učencih v 6. in 8. razredu osnovne šole: Raziskovalno poročilo [The influence of various factors on the experience and signs of stress among students in the sixth and eighth grades of primary school: Research Report]. Zavod Republike Slovenije za šolstvo.
Shannon, D., & Rogue, J. (2009). Refusing to wait: Anarchism & intersectionality. Zabalaza Books.
Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. Sage.
Sternad, M. (2012). Socialnopedagoško sodelovanje z družinami z več problem [Social-pedagogical cooperation with families with multiple problems]. Socialna pedagogika, 16(4), 437–468.
Turnšek, N., Poljšak-Škraban, O., Razpotnik, Š., & Rapuš-Pavel, J. (2016). Challenges and responses to the vulnerability of families in a preschool context. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 6(4), 29–49.
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education International Commission on the Futures of Education, UNESCO.
Vandenbroeck, M., Boonaert T., & Van Der Mespel, S. (2009). Dialogical spaces to reconceptualize parent support in the social investment state. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 10(1), 66–77.
Vandenbroeck, M. & Bouverne-De Bie, M. (2006). Children’s agency and educational norms (A tensed negotiation). Childhood, 13(1), 127–143.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
