Using Remap RT (Reading – Concept Mapping – Reciprocal Teaching) Learning Model to Improve Low-Ability Students’ Achievement in Biology

  • Siti Zubaidah Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
  • Susriyati Mahanal Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
  • Mar’atus Sholihah Faculty of Education, Universitas Islam Balitar, Indonesia
  • Fatia Rosyida Tuban Public High School 4, Indonesia
  • Zenia Lutfi Kurniawati Mulawarman University Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Indonesia
Keywords: students’ achievement, academic ability, reading ability, concept map, cooperative learning, Remap RT

Abstract

The main aim of this study was to investigate the effects of the Remap RT (Reading – Concept Mapping – Reciprocal Teaching) learning model on low-ability students’ achievement in biology. This quasi-experimental research made use of a pre-test-post-test non-equivalent control group design. The population of this research was 125 tenth-grade students from the Natural Science classes aged around 16 years old. Four classes were randomly selected as the samples, and they were divided into two groups: two classes belonged to the high ability classes, and the other two were categorised into the low ability groups. The students’ achievement was measured using an essay test. The results of the test were analysed using ANCOVA. The findings indicated that 1) students who learned using Remap RT had better academic achievement in biology than students who learned using a conventional method; 2) students with high academic ability had better academic achievement than students with low academic achievement; and 3) low-ability students who learned using Remap RT and high-ability students who learned using a conventional method had equal academic achievement. The results of the research suggest that Remap RT was effective in improving low-ability students’ achievement in biology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, R. A. (2013). Cooperative learning effects on the classroom (Published master’s thesis, Northern Michigan University).

Adediwura, A. A., & Tayo, B. (2007). Perception of teachers’ knowledge, attitude and teaching skills as a predictor of academic performance in Nigerian secondary schools. Educational Research and Review, 2(7), 165–171.

Adhani, A. (2014). Pengaruh pembelajaran reciprocal teaching dan kemampuan akademik terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis, aktivitas lisan, dan hasil belajar kognitif biologi siswa kelas XI semester genap di SMA Kabupaten Takalar [The effect of reciprocal teaching and academic ability on critical thinking skills, oral activities and biology cognitive learning results of class XI students in the second semester of Senior High School Kabupaten Takalar (Abstract)]. Retrieved from http://library.um.ac.id/free-contents/download/pub/pub. php/65353.pdf

Akanda, A. K. M. E. A., Hoq, K. M. G., & Hasan, N. (2013). Reading habit of
students in social sciences and arts: A case study of Rajshahi University. Chinese
Librarianship: an International Electronic Journal, 35. Retrieved from http://www.iclc.us/cliej/cl35AHH.pdf

Akiri, A. A., & Ugborugbo, N. M. (2009). Teachers’ effectiveness and students’ performance in public secondary schools in Delta State, Nigeria. Stud Home CommSci, 3(2), 107–113.

Alabekee, C. E., Samuel, A., & Osaat, S. (2015). Effect of cooperative learning strategy on students learning experience and achievements in mathematics. International Journal of Education Learning and Development, 3(4), 67–75.

Allington, R. L. (1984). Oral reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 829–864). New York, NY: Longman.

Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. New York, NY: Longman.

Antika, L. T. (2015). Hubungan antara minat baca, keterampilan metakognitif, dan keterampilan berpikir kritis dengan hasil belajar biologi berbasis reading concept map think pair share [Relationship between reading interest, Metacognitive skills, and critical thinking skills with learning-based biology learning reading concept map think pair share] (Unpublished master thesis). Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia.

Arleen, M. (2010). Sustaining students' reading comprehension. Kappa Delta Pi, 46(2), 87–89.

Bachtiar, S., Zubaidah, S., Corebima, A. D., & Indriwati, S. E. (2018). The spiritual and social attitudes of students towards integrated problem based learning models. Issues in Educational Research, 28(2), 254–270.

Bolkan, S., & Goodboy, A. (2009). Transformational leadership in the classroom: Fostering student learning, student participation, and teacher credibility. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 36(4), 296–306.

Brinkerhoff, J. L., & Booth, G. M. (2013). The effect of concept mapping on student achievement in an introductory non-majors biology class. European International Journal of Science and Technology, 2(8), 43–72.

Brown, A. L., Palincsar, A. S., & Purcell, L. (1986). Poor readers: Teach, don't label. In U. Neisser (Ed.), The academic performance of minority children: A new perspective (pp. 105–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Buchs, C., Filippou, D., Pulfery, C., & Volpe, Y. (2017). Challenges for cooperative learning implementation: Reports from elementary school teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(3), 296–306.

Busato, V. V., Prins, F. J., Elshout, J. J., & Hamaker, C. (2000). Intellectual ability, learning style, personality, achievement motivation and academic success of psychology students in higher education. Personality and Individual Differences, 29(6), 1057–1068.

Chall, J. (2000). The academic achievement challenge: What really works in the classroom. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Arteche, A. (2008). Intellectual competence and academic performance: Preliminary validation of a model. Intelligence, 36(6), 564–573.

Chen, Q., & Liu, Y. (2017). The impact of cooperative learning on students’ achievements and its changes over the past decade. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(2), 75–88.

Chiou, C. (2008). The effect of concept mapping on students’ learning achievements and interests. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(4), 375–387.

Colombo, M. (2011). Teaching English language learners: 43 strategies for successful K-8 classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Corebima, A. D. (2005, May). Pengukuran kemampuan Berpikir pada pembelajaran biologi [Measuring thinking ability in biology learning]. Paper presented at Seminar Dies 41st Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1998). What reading does for the mind. American Educator/American Federation of Teachers, 1(2), 137–149.

Daley, J. B. (2010). Concept maps: Practice applications in adult education and human resource development. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 24(2-4), 31–37.

Davies. 1997. Introducing reading. New York, NY: Penguin English.

Deka, U. (1993). Factors of academic achievement: A comparative study of high and low achievers. New Delhi: Northern Book Centre.

Diaz, A. L. (2003). Personal, family, and academic factors affecting low achievement in secondary school. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology and Psychopedagogy, 1(1), 43–66.

Dinnurriya, M. S. (2015). Pengaruh model pembelajaran biologi berbasis reading concept map numbered heads together (Remap NHT) terhadap minat baca, kemampuan metakognitif, keterampilan berpikir kritis, dan hasil belajar kognitif siswa kelas X SMA Malang (Abstract) [The effect of biology learning model-based on reading concept map numbered heads together (Remap NHT) on reading interest, metacognitive ability, critical thinking skills, and cognitive learning results of the students of class X Senior High School Malang (Abstract)]. Retrieved from http://karyailmiah.um.ac.id/index.php/ disertasi/article/view/41789

Efendi, N. (2013). Pengaruh pembelajaran reciprocal teaching dipadukan think pair share terhadap peningkatan kemampuan metakognitif siswa SMA berkemampuan akademik berbeda di Kabupaten Sidoarjo [The effect of reciprocal teaching learning integrated with think pair share on the improvement of metacognitive of Senior High School students having different levels of academic ability in Sidoarjo District]. Jurnal Santiaji Pendidikan, 3(2), 85–109.

El Koumy, A. S. A. K. (2006). The effect of the directed reading-thinking activity on EFL students’ referential and inferential comprehension. Egypt: Suez Canal University.

Erickson, E. (2008). A Reading program to narrow the achievement gap. Reading Improvement, 45(4), 170–180.

Fuad, N. M., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Suarsini, E. (2016). Improving junior high schools’ critical thinking skills based on test three different models of learning. International Journal of Instruction, 10(1), 101–106.

Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Louwerse, M. M. (2003). What do readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative and expository text? In A. P. Sweet & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 82–98). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Ganai, M. Y., & Maqbool, A. (2016). A Study of self-concept, mental health and academic achievement of orphan and non-orphan adolescents. Hamburg: Anchor Academic Publishing.

Glynn, T., Wearmouth, J., & Berryman, M. (2005). Supporting students with literacy difficulties: A responsive approach. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press, McGraw-Hill Education.

Guastello, E. F., Beasley, T. M., & Sinatra, R. C. (2000). Concept mapping effects on science content comprehension of low-achieving inner-city seventh graders. Remedial and Special Education, 21(6), 264–356.

Gull, F., & Shehzad, S. (2015). Effects of cooperative learning on students’ academic achievement. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(3), 246–255.

Handoko, F., Nursanti, E., Harmanto, D., & Sutriono. (2016). The role of tacit and codified knowledge within technology transfer program on technology adaptation. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11(8), 5275–5282.

Handoko, F., Smith, A., & Burvill, C. (2014). The role of government, universities, and businesses in advancing technology for SMEs’ innovativeness. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 12(2), 171–180.

Hannon, B., & Daneman, M. (2001). A new tool for measuring and understanding individual differences in the component processes of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 103−128.

Hariyadi, S., Corebima, A. D., Zubaidah, S., & Ibrohim, S. (2018). Contribution of mind mapping, summarizing, and Questioning in the RQA learning model to genetic learning outcomes. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(1), 80–88
Hasan, A., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2014). Implementasi model pembelajaran reading map student teams achievement divisions untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan hasil belajar biologi peserta didik kelas X IPA SMA Insan Cendekia Shalahudin Malang [The implementation of reading concept map student teams achievement divisions learning model to improve reading interest, critical thinking skills, Metacognitive awareness and learning results of the students of class X Natural Science of Senior High Insan Cendekia Shalahudin Malang]. Proceeding of National Conference XI Biology Education FKIP UNS: Biologi, Sains, Lingkungan, dan Pembelajarannya, 11(1), 810–817.

Jacob, A., B., & Leafgreen, L. (2004). Remedial education and student achievement: A regression-discontinuity analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 226–244.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory Into Practice, 38(2), 67–73.

Kadian, A. (2016). The relation between academic achievement, executive function, intelligence, and metacognition. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(4), 166–174.

Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative learning, resources for teachers. San Juan Capistrano, CA: Kagan Cooperative Learning.

Kardeniz, A. (2015). An examination of critical reading self-efficacy perceptions among the students of the faculty of education over different variables. Anthropologist, 22(2), 167–175.

Kerneza, M., & Kosir, K. (2016). Comics as a literary-didactic method and their use for reducing gender differences in reading literacy at the primary level of education. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 6(2), 125–149.

Kinchin, I. M., & Hay, D. B. (2000). How a qualitative approach to concept map analysis can be used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development. Educational Research, 42(1), 43–57.

King, A. (1991). Effects of training in strategy questioning on children’s problem-solving performance. Journal of Education Psychology, 83(3), 307–317.

Knipper, K. J. (2003). Reading programs don’t teach-teachers teach! The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 69(2), 36–40.

Kulkarni, M. (2016). Benefits of ICT-based learning strategies for students. Raleigh: Lulu Publication.

Kurniawati, Z. L. (2016). Pengaruh model pembelajaran biologi berbasis reading-concept map-cooperative script (Remap-CS) dan kemampuan akademik terhadap keterampilan metakognitif, keterampilan berpikir kritis, dan hasil belajar kognitif siswa kelas X SMA negeri Kota Batu [The influence of learning-based biology model of reading-concept map-cooperative script (Remap-CS) and academic ability to metacognitive skills, critical thinking skills, and cognitive learning outcomes of grade X students of State Senior High School Batu](Unpublished master thesis). Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia.

Lubliner, S. (2004). Help for struggling upper-grade elementary readers. The Reading Teacher, 57(5), 430–438.

Mahakulkar, V., & Wanjari, S. 2013. Assessing reading habits of b. ed. trainee teachers. International Journal of Education and Psychological Research (IJEPR), 2(4), 99–105.

Mahanal, S., Zubaidah, S., Bahri, A., & Dinnurriyya, S. M. (2016). Improving students’ critical thinking skills through Remap NHT in Biology classroom. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(2), 1–19.

Mahanal, S., Tendrita, M., Ramadhan, F., Ismirawati, N., & Zubaidah, S. 2017. The analysis of students’ critical thinking skills on biology subject. Anatolian Journal of Instruction, 2(2), 21–39.

Mamu, H. D. (2014). Pengaruh strategi pembelajaran, kemampuan akademik dan interaksinya terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis dan hasil belajar kognitif IPA biologi [The effect of learning strategies, academic ability and their interaction on critical thinking skills and cognitive learning results of science biology]. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 2(1), 1–11.

Marthaliakirana, A. D. (2014). Pengaruh strategi pembelajaran reading, questening and answering (RQA) dan reciprocal teaching (RT) terhadap kemampuan metakognitif, pemahaman konsep dan retensi dalam pembelajaran biologi siswa SMA di Jember [The influence of reading, questioning, and answering (RQA) and Reciprocal teaching (RT) learning strategy toward high school students’ metacognitive skills, Concept understanding, and retention on biology lesson in Jember] (Unpublished master thesis). Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang Indonesia.

Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Marzano, R. J. (2004). Building background knowledge for academic achievement: Research on what works in schools. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Marzano, R. J. (2006). Classroom assessment and grading that work. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

McAllum, R. (2014). Reciprocal teaching: Critical reflection on practice. Kairaranga, 15(1), 26–35.

McCloughlin, T. J. J., & Matthews, P. S. C. (2017). Personal constructions of biological concepts–the repertory grid approach. Center for educational policy studies Journal, 7(1), 93–110.

McKenna, M. C. (2002). Help for struggling readers: Strategies for grades 3-8. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
McLeod, J., Fisher, J., & Hoover, G. (2003). The key elements of classroom management: managing time and space, student behavior, and instructional strategies. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Mistianah., Corebima, A. D., & Zubaidah, S. (2015, April). Perbedaan keterampilan metakognitif dan hasil belajar biologi antara siswa yang diberi model pembelajaran reading concept map GI dengan reading concept map jigsaw di SMA Negeri Kota Malang [The differences in metacognitive skills and learning results between the students who learned by using reading concept map GI learning model and those who learned by using reading concept map jigsaw in public Senior High Schools Malang]. Paper presented at Conference National Biology Education, Symposium on Biology Education (Symbion) in Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Jogjakarta, Indonesia.

Mullis, I. V. S. (2012). PIRLS 2011 international results in reading. Boston, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Student Center, Lynch School of Education.

Nesbit, J, C., & Adesope, O.O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps. A Meta-Analysis Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 413–448.

Newman-Ford, L., Lloyd, S., & Thomas, S. (2009). An investigation into the effects of gender, prior academic achievement, place of residence, age, and attendance on first-year undergraduate attainment. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 1(1), 13–28.

Niemi, D. (1999). Assessment models for aligning standards and classroom practice. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Graduate School of Education and Information studies, Centre for the Study of Evaluation, & National Centre for Research on Evaluation, Standards and Students Testing.

Novak, J. D., & Canas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them, technical report IHMC Cmap Tools. Pensacola, FL: Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.

Novak. J. D. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct them. Pensacola, FL: Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.

Novak. J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners. Science Education, 86(4), 548–571.

Ögeyik, M. C., & Akyay, E. (2009). Investigating reading habits and preferences of student teachers at foreign language departments. The International Journal of Language Society and Culture, 28, 72–79.

Ogonnaya, U. P., Okafor, G., Abonyi, O. S., & Gama, J. O. (2016). Effects of concept mapping instruction approach on students’ achievement in basic science. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(8), 79–84.

Owusu-Acheaw, M. (2014). Reading habits among students and its effect on academic performance: A study of students of Koforidua Polytechnic. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1130/

Özbay, M. 2006. Okuma eğitiminde çevre faktörü [Environmental factor in reading education]. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 24, 161–170.

Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., & McNamara, D.S. (2009). Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 228–242.

Padma, B. (2008). Reciprocal teaching techniques. Delhi: Balaji Offset.

Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175.

Palincsar, A. S., & Klenk, L. (1991). Dialogues promoting reading comprehension: Teaching advanced skill to at-risk student. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Pangestuti, A. A. (2014). Penerapan model pembelajaran biologi berbasis reading concept map teams games tournaments untuk meningkatkan minat baca, kemampuan berpikir kritis, metakognitif, dan hasil belajar kognitif siswa kelas X IPA 4 SMA Laboratorium UM [The implementation of biology learning model based on reading concept map teams games tournaments to improve reading interest, critical thinking skill, metacognition, and cognitive learning results of the students of class X natural science 4 Senior High Schools Laboratory UM (Abstract)]. Retrieved from http://mulok.library.um.ac.id/index3. php/66810.html

Pangestuti, A. A., Susilo, H., & Zubaidah, S. (June, 2014). Penerapan model pembelajaran biologi berbasis reading – concept map –teams games tournaments untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan hasil belajar kognitif siswa kelas X IPA 4 SMA Laboratorium UM [The implementation of biology learning model based on reading concept map teams games tournaments to improve critical thinking skill and cognitive learning results of the students of class X natural science 4 Senior High Schools Laboratory UM]. Paper presented at National Conference XI Biology, Sains, Environment, dan Education in Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Pangestuti, A. A., Mistianah., Corebima, A. D., & Zubaidah, S. (2015). Using reading-concept map-teams games tournament (Remap-TGT) to improve reading interest of tenth grade student of laboratory Senior High School State University of Malang. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(2), 250–254.

Parker, L. E. (1994). Working together: perceived self and collective-efficacy at the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(1), 43–59.

Patrick, A. O. (2011). Concept mapping as a study skill: Effects on students’ achievement in biology. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(1), 49–57.

Patterson, N. (2016). Reading: A Definition that Supports Instruction. Colleagues, 13(1), Article 4. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/colleagues/vol13/iss1/4

Prasmala, E. R., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2014). Penerapan model reading map group investigation (GI)untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan hasil belajar biologi siswa kelas X SMA Surya Buana Malang [Implementation of model mind map investigation (GI) to increase critical thinking ability and learning result of student Biology of class X SMA Surya Buana Malang]. Proceedings of National Seminar XI Biology Education UNS, 11(1), 835–839.

Prayitno, A. B., Corebima. D., Susilo. H., Zubaidah. S., & Ramli. M. (2017). Closing the science process skills gap between students with high and low-level academic achievement. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(2), 266–277.
Parveen, Q. (2012). Effect of cooperative learning on achievement of students in general science at secondary level. International Education Studies, 5(2), 54–58.

Prihatiningsih, Zubaidah, S., & Kusairi, S. (2016). Kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMP pada materi klasifikasi makhluk hidup [Critical thinking ability of Junior High School students on material classification of living creatures]. National Seminar Proceeding. Pendidikan IPA Pascasarjana UM, Universitas Negeri Malang.

Ramadhan, F. (2017). Pengaruh model pembelajaran biologi berbasis reading concept map student teams achievement division (remap STAD) dan kemampuan akademik terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis, keterampilan berpikir kreatif, dan hasil belajar kognitif siswa kelas X SMA Kota Batu [The influence of learning model biology based reading- concept map student teams achievement division (Remap-STAD) and academic ability to critical thinking skills, creative thinking skills, and cognitive learning outcomes of grade X students of SMA Batu City](Unpublished master thesis). Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia.

Rosyida, F. (2016). Pengaruh pembelajaran biologi berbasis reading concept map-timed pair share dan kemampuan akademik berbeda terhadap keterampilan metakognitif, keterampilan berpikir kritis, dan hasil belajar kognitif siswa kelas X MIA SMA Negeri Batu [The influence of learning based biology reading concept map-timed pair share and academic ability different to metacognitive skills, critical thinking skills, and cognitive learning outcomes of grade X students of SMA Negeri Batu] (Unpublished master thesis). Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia.

Santiago, H. C. (2011). Visual mapping to enhance learning and critical thinking skills. Optometric Education, 36(3), 125–139.

Setiawan, D., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2015). Minat baca dan keterampilan metakognitif pada pembelajaran biologi berbasis reading concept map think pair share [Reading interests and metacognitive skills on learning-based biology reading concept map think pair share]. Paper presented at the national seminar on biological education, a symposium on Biology Education (Symbion), Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Jogjakarta.

Shamshuddin, S. (2007). Values and academic achievement. New Delhi: Discovery Publishing House.

Sholihah, M. (2016). Pengaruh model pembelajaran biologi berbasis reading concept map reciprocal teaching (Remap RT) dan kemampuan akademik berbeda terhadap keterampilan metakognitif, keterampilan berpikir kritis, dan hasil belajar kognitif siswa kelas X SMA Negeri Kota Batu [Influence of learning-based biology model reading concept map reciprocal teaching (Remap RT) and different academic ability to metacognitive skills, critical thinking skills, and cognitive learning outcomes of grade X students of State Senior High School Batu] (Unpublished master thesis). Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang Indonesia.

Siegel, C. (2005). Implementing a research based model of cooperative learning. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(6), 1–15.

Siska, F., Ardi., & Risdawati, R. (2016). Pengembangan lembar kejra siswa bernuansa problem based learning pada materi protista untuk siswa SMA [Development of student worksheet nuanced problem based learning on protista material for Senior High School students]. Padang: Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan PGRI Sumatera Barat.

Slavin, R. E. (2005). Cooperative learning. London, UK: Allyn and Bacon.

Smajdek, A., & Selan, J. (2016). The impact of active visualisation of high school students on the ability to memorise verbal definitions. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 6(4), 163–185.

Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21–51.

Sukardi, D, A., Susilo, H., & Zubaidah, S. (2015). Pengaruh pembelajaran reciprocal teaching berbantuan peta pikiran (mind map) terhadap kemampuan metakognitif dan hasil belajar siswa SMA [The influence of reciprocal teaching-aided learning mind map (mind map) on metacognitive ability and high school students outcomes]. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 3(2), 81–89.

Suparoh, S. (2010). Analisis kesulitan belajar siswa dalam memahami konsep biologi pada konsep monera [Analysis of students' learning difficulties in understanding the concept of biology on the concept of monera]. Jakarta: Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah.

Suratno. (2009). Pengaruh strategi kooperatif jigsaw dan reciprocal teaching terhadap keterampilan metakognisi dan hasil belajar biologi siswa sma berkemampuan atas dan bawah di Jember [The effect of cooperative strategy jigsaw and reciprocal teaching on metacognitive skills and biology learning results of senior high school students having high and low academic ability in Jember] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia.

Tran, D. V. (2014). The effects of cooperative learning on the academic achievement and knowledge retention. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(2), 131–140.

Tendrita, M. (2017). Pengaruh model pembelajaran biologi berbasis reading-concept map-think pair share (Remap-TPS) dan Kemampuan Akademik Berbeda terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis, Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif, dan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa Kelas X Kota Batu [The Influence of Learning-Based Biology Model of Reading-Concept Map-Think Pair Share (Remap-TPS) and Different Academic Ability to Critical Thinking Skills, Creative Thinking Skills, and Cognitive Learning Outcomes of Stone X Year Students] (Unpublished master thesis). Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang Indonesia.

Tendrita, M., Mahanal, S., & Zubaidah, S. (2017). Pembelajaran reading-concept-map think pair share (Remap TPS) dapat meningkatkan hasil belajar kognitif [Reading-concept-map learning think pair share (Remap TPS) can improve cognitive learning outcomes]. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 2(6), 763–767.

Vanides, J., Yin, Y., Tomita, M., & Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2005). Using concept maps in the science classroom. National Science Teachers Association (NSTA), 28(8), 27–31.

Veas, A., Gilar, R., & Minano, P. (2016). The influence of gender, intellectual ability, academic, self-concept, self-regulation, learning strategies, popularity and parent involvement in early adolescence. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(8), 591–597.

Veenman, M. V. J., & Beishuizen, J. J. (2004). Intellectual and metacognitive skills of novices while studying texts under conditions of text difficulty and time constraint. Learning and Instruction, 14(6), 621-640.

Veenman, M. V. J., & Spaans, M. A. (2005). The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age and task differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 15(2), 159–176.

Vermon, P. A. (1990). The use of biological measures to estimate behavior intelligence. Educational Psychologist, 25(3-4), 293–304.

Vermunt, J. D., & Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9, 257–280.

Wanjari, S., & Mahakulkar, V. (2011). Assessing reading habits of trainee teachers. Indian Streams Research Journal, 11(1), 76–81.

Warouw, Z. W. M. (2009). Pengaruh pembelajaran metakognitif dalam strategi cooperative script dan reciprocal teaching pada kemampuan akademik berbeda terhadap kemampuan dan keterampilan metakognitif, berpikir kritis, hasil belajar biologi siswa, serta retensinya di SMP Negeri Manado [The influence of metacognitive learning in cooperative script and reciprocal teaching strategies on the different academic ability to metacognitive skills and skills, critical thinking, student biology learning outcomes, and retention in SMP Negeri Manado] (Unpublished master thesis). Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang Indonesia.

Widayati. (2015). Pengaruh strategi pembelajaran reading questioning and answering dipadu dengan think pair share dan kemampuan akademik terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis dan hasil belajar kognitif pada pembelajaran biologi kelas VIII SMP di Kabupaten Blitar (Abstract) [The effect of reading questioning and answering learning strategies combined with think pair share and academic ability on the critical thinking skills and cognitive learning results in biology learning of class VIII Junior High School students in Blitar (Abstract)]. Retrieved from http:// karya-ilmiah.um.ac.id/index.php/disertasi/article/view/42637

Yusnaeni, Corebima, A. D., Susilo, H., & Zubaidah, S. (2017). Creative thinking of low academic student undergoing search solve create and share learning integrated with metacognitive strategy. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), 245–262.

Zubaidah, S. (2014, June). Pemberdayaan keterampilan penemuan dalam scientific approach melalui pembelajaran berbasis remap coople [Empowering the discovery skills in scientific approach by using remap coople based learning]. Paper presented at National Conference XI Biology, Sains, Environment, dan Education in Universitas Sebelas Maret, Solo.

Zubaidah, S., Corebima, A. D., Mahanal, S., & Mistianah. (2018). Revealing the relationship between reading interest and critical thinking skills through remap GI and remap jigsaw. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 41–56.

Zubaidah, S., Fuad, N. M., Mahanal, S., Suarsini, E. (2017). Improving creative thinking skills of students through differentiated science inquiry integrated with mind map. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(4), 77–91.
Published
2019-10-22