Coleman's Third Report
Abstract
The article analyses the (third) Coleman Report on private and public schools. The report scrutinises the relationship between private and public schools and shows that private school students show better academic achievement. Coleman concluded that these findings provided a strong argument in favour of public financial support for private schools. However, he identified a number of school characteristics that he believed to be related to student achievement. According to his analysis, these characteristics were not limited to private schools; public schools exhibiting the same characteristics also had good results. Coleman interpreted the available data in favour of financial aid to private schools, although this was not the only possible interpretation. An alternative conclusion would have been to encourage these characteristics in public schools. Why did Coleman disregard this possibility? Why did he deviate from his usual scientific rigour? The present article suggests that there appear to be two reasons for the narrow interpretation of the relationship between public and private schools in Coleman's third report. The first lies in Coleman's notion of contemporary society as a constructed system in which every individual actor holds a place in the structure and requires incentives in order to act to the benefit of society. In the case of education, the goal of the institution is to ensure the high cognitive achievement of students, and the incentive is related to choice and competition. The second reason is related to Coleman's vision of sociology as a discipline aiding the construction of an effective society.
Downloads
References
Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartlan, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office.
Coleman, J. S. (1967). Toward open schools. The Public Interest, 3(3), 20–27.
Coleman, J. S. (1975). Recent Trends in School Integration, Educational Researcher, 4(7), 3–12.
Coleman, J. S. (1981). Private schools, public schools, and the public interest. The Public Interest, 17(3), 19–30.
Coleman, J. S., Hoffer, T., & Kilgore, S. (1981a). Public and Private Schools. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.
Coleman, J. S., Hoffer, T., & Kilgore, S. (1981b). Questions and Answers: Our Response. Harvard Educational Review, 51(4), 526–545.
Coleman, J. S., Hoffer, T., & Kilgore, S. (1982a). Public and Private Schools. Society, 19(2), 4–9.
Coleman, J. S., Hoffer, T., & Kilgore, S. (1982b). Cognitive Outcomes in Public and Private Schools. Sociology of Education, 55(2), 65–76.
Coleman, J. S., Hoffer, T., & Kilgore, S. (1982c). Achievement and Segregation in Secondary Schools: A Further Look at Public and Private School Differences. Sociology of Education, 55(2), 162–182.
Coleman, J. S., Hoffer, T., & Kilgore, S. (1982d). High School Achievement: Public, Catholic, and Private Schools Compared. New York: Basic Books.
Coleman, J. S. (1989). Response to the Sociology of Education Award. Academic Questions, 2(3), 76–78.
Coleman, J. S. (1991). Prologue: Constructed Social Organization. In P. Bourdieu, & J. S. Coleman, (Eds.), Social Theory for a Changing Society (pp. 1–14), Boulder: Westview Press.
Coleman, J. S. (1992). Some Points on Choice in Education. Sociology of Education, 65(4), 260–262.
Coleman, J. S. (1993). The Rational Reconstruction of Society. 1992 Presidential Address. American Sociological Review 58(1), 1–15.
Finn, C. E. (1981). Why Public and Private Schools Matter. Harvard Educational Review, 51(4), 510–514.
Murnane, R. J. (1981). Evidence, Analysis and Unanswered Questions. Harvard Educational Review, 51(4), 483–489.
Murnane, R. J. (1984). A Review Essay – Comparisons of Public and Private Schools: Lessons from the Uproar. The Journal of Human Resources, 19(2), 263–277.
Noell, J. (1982). Public and Catholic Schools: A Reanalysis of ¨Public and Private Schools¨. Sociology of Education, 55(2), 123–132.
Persell, C. H. (2000). Values, Control, and Outcomes in Public and Private Schools. In Hallinan M. H. (Ed.), Handbook of the Sociology of Education (pp. 387–407). New York: Springer.
Sernau, S. (1992). School Choices, Rational and Otherwise: A Comment on Coleman. Sociology of Education, 66(1), 88–90.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
