Nature of Science in Greek Secondary School Biology Textbooks
Abstract
The nature of science describes what science is, how it works, and its interactions with society under the perspectives of philosophy, history, sociology, and psychology of science. Understanding it is an essential aspect of scientific literacy. Given the critical role that school textbooks hold, considering what is taught and how it is taught in schools, we find the presence of the nature of science in school science textbooks to be significant. In this research paper, all Greek biology textbooks of lower secondary education are analysed to evaluate whether principal elements of the nature of science can be found in them. The whole array of educational resources available (textbooks, workbooks, lab guides, teachers’ books) was analysed as well as the corresponding official biology curricula. Content analysis was the method of choice, and the ‘meaning unit’ was the unit of analysis. We found that most of the nature of science references in the material that students were taught in 2021/22 was implicit and not especially designed by the curriculum. Some nature of science aspects were more commonly found (e.g., evidence is vital in science) than others (e.g., science has limits). The most opportunities for the nature of science to be introduced were found in history of science vignettes, laboratory activities, and some optional inquiry activities. However, without a structured design from the curriculum, it is the teachers’ responsibility to design and facilitate nature of science instruction (or not). We conclude that lacking explicit references, the nature of science falls into the hidden curriculum and becomes falsely depicted, enforcing a positivist image of science.
Downloads
References
Abdâ€Elâ€Khalick, F., Waters, M., & Le, A. P. (2008). Representations of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 45(7), 835–855. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20226
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000a). The influence of history of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1057–1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:10<1057::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-C
Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, 95(3), 518–542. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20432
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
Campanile, M. F., Lederman, N. G., & Kampourakis, K. (2015). Mendelian genetics as a platform for teaching about nature of science and scientific inquiry: The value of textbooks. Science & Education, 24(1), 205–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9607-4
Clough, M. P. (2011). Teaching and assessing the nature of science. The Science Teacher, 78(6), 56–60.
Government Gazette. (2003). 304/13-03-2003. Διαθεματικό ενιαίο πλαίσιο Ï€ÏογÏαμμάτων σπουδών (Δ.Ε.Î .Î .Σ.) και αναλυτικά Ï€ÏογÏάμματα σπουδών (Α.Î .Σ.) Î”Î·Î¼Î¿Ï„Î¹ÎºÎ¿Ï Î“Ï…Î¼Î½Î±ÏƒÎ¯Î¿Ï… [Interdisciplinary unified framework of study programs and curricula of primary school and high school].
Government Gazette. (2016). 1640/Β΄/9-6-2016. ΩÏολόγιο Ï€ÏόγÏαμμα των μαθημάτων των Α', Î’', Γ' τάξεων του ημεÏησίου γυμνασίου [Schedule of the lessons of the A', B', C' classes of high school].
Haagen-Schützenhöfer, C., & Joham, B. (2018). Professionalising physics teachers in doing experimental work. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 8(1), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.333
Hansson, L. (2020). Teaching the limits of science with card-Sorting activities. In W. McComas (Ed), Nature of science in science instruction: Rationales and strategies (pp. 627–639). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57239-6_34
Hansson, L. (2018). Science education, indoctrination, and the hidden curriculum. In M. Matthews (Eds.), History, philosophy and science teaching. Science: philosophy, history and education (pp. 283–306). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62616-1_11
Höttecke, D., & Silva, C. C. (2011). Why implementing history and philosophy in school science education is a challenge: An analysis of obstacles. Science and Education, 20(3), 293–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9285-4
Kampourakis, K. (2017). Nature of science representations in Greek secondary school biology textbooks. In C. V. McDonald & F. Abd-El-Khalick (Eds.), Representations of nature of science in school science textbooks. A global perspective (pp. 130–146). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315650524-6
Kampourakis, K. (2016). The “general aspects†conceptualisation as a pragmatic and effective means to introducing students to nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(5), 667–682. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21305
Koumara, A., & Plakitsi, K. (2020). The degree that nature of scientific knowledge aspects are included in the science classes of Greek high schools. World Journal of Education, 10(5), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v10n5p1
Irez, S. (2009). Nature of science as depicted in Turkish biology textbooks. Science Education, 93(3), 422–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_44
Kapsala, N., & Mavrikaki E. (2020). Storytelling as a pedagogical tool in nature of science instruction. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), Nature of science in science instruction: rationales and strategies (pp. 485–512). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57239-6_27
Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2012). Nature of scientific knowledge and scientific inquiry: Building instructional capacity through professional development. In B. J. Fraser et al. (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 335–359). Springer.
Lederman, N. G. (2013). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–880). Routledge.
Lin, C.-Y., Cheng, J.-H., & Chang, W.-H. (2010). Making science vivid: Using a historical episodes map. International Journal of Science Education, 32(18), 2521–2531. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500691003746015
Marniok, K., & Reiners, C. S. (2017). Representations of nature of science in German school chemistry textbooks. In C. V. McDonald & F. Abd-El-Khalick (Eds.), Representations of nature of science in school science textbooks (pp. 201–214). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315650524-11
Matić, L. J. (2019). The teacher as a lesson designer. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 9(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.722
Mavrikaki, E., Gouvra, M., & Kampouri, A. (2007a). Βιολογία Α΄ Γυμνασίου. Αθήνα: ΟÏγανισμός Εκδόσεως Διδακτικών Βιβλίων [7th grade biology students’ textbook]. Textbook Publishing Organization.
http://ebooks.edu.gr/ebooks/v2/books-pdf.jsp?handle=8547/106
Mavrikaki, E., Gouvra, M., & Kampouri, A. (2007b). Βιολογία Α΄ Γυμνασίου ΤετÏάδιο ΕÏγασιών. Αθήνα: ΟÏγανισμός Εκδόσεως Διδακτικών Βιβλίων [7th grade biology students’ workbook]. Textbook Publishing Organization.
Mavrikaki, E., Gouvra, M., & Kampouri, A. (2007c). Βιολογία Α΄ Γυμνασίου ΕÏγαστηÏιακός Οδηγός. Αθήνα: ΟÏγανισμός Εκδόσεως Διδακτικών Βιβλίων [7th grade biology students’ lab-book]. Textbook Publishing Organization.
Mavrikaki, E., Gouvra, M., & Kampouri, A. (2007d). Βιολογία Α΄ Γυμνασίου Βιβλίο ΕκπαιδευτικοÏ. Αθήνα: ΟÏγανισμός Εκδόσεως Διδακτικών Βιβλίων [7th grade biology teachers’ book]. Textbook Publishing Organization. http://ebooks.edu.gr/ebooks/handle/8547/4927
Mavrikaki, E., Gouvra, M., & Kampouri, A. (2007e). Βιολογία Γ΄ Γυμνασίου. Αθήνα: ΟÏγανισμός Εκδόσεως Διδακτικών Βιβλίων [9th grade biology students’ textbook]. Textbook Publishing Organization. http://ebooks.edu.gr/ebooks/v2/books-pdf.jsp?handle=8547/108
Mavrikaki, E., Gouvra, M., & Kampouri, A. (2007f). Βιολογία Γ΄ Γυμνασίου ΤετÏάδιο ΕÏγασιών. Αθήνα: ΟÏγανισμός Εκδόσεως Διδακτικών Βιβλίων [9th grade biology students’ workbook]. Textbook Publishing Organization.
Mavrikaki, E., Gouvra, M., & Kampouri, A. (2007g). Βιολογία Γ΄ Γυμνασίου ΕÏγαστηÏιακός Οδηγός. Αθήνα: ΟÏγανισμός Εκδόσεως Διδακτικών Βιβλίων [9th grade biology students’ lab-book]. Textbook Publishing Organization.
Mavrikaki, E., Gouvra, M., & Kampouri, A. (2007h). Βιολογία Γ΄ Γυμνασίου Βιβλίο ΕκπαιδευτικοÏ. Αθήνα: ΟÏγανισμός Εκδόσεως Διδακτικών Βιβλίων. [9th grade biology students’ textbook]. Textbook Publishing Organization. http://www.pi-schools.gr/books/gymnasio/biologia_a/kath/kath_1_150.pdf
McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Nouri, N. (2020). Nature of science and classroom practice: A review of the literature with implications for effective NOS instruction. In W. F. McCommas (Ed.), Nature of science in science instruction: Rationales and strategies (pp. 67–111). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57239-6_4
McComas, W. F. (2020). Principal elements of nature of science: Informing science teaching while dispelling the myths. In W. F. McCommas (Ed.), Nature of science in science instruction: Rationales and strategies (pp. 35–65). Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57239-6_3
McComas, W. F., & Kampourakis, K. (2015). Using the history of biology, chemistry, geology, and physics to illustrate general aspects of nature of science. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 9(1), 47–76. https://doi.org/10.26220/rev.2240
McDonald, C. V., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2017). Representations of nature of science in school science textbooks. In C. V. McDonald & F. Abd-El-Khalick (Eds.), Representations of nature of science in school science textbooks. A global perspective (pp. 1–19). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315650524-1
Mesci, G., & Schwartz, R. (2016). Changing preservice science teachers’ views of nature of science: Why some conceptions may be more easily altered than others. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9503-9
Ministry of Education and Religious Affairs (2021). 109009/Δ2/07-09-2021 Οδηγίες για τη διδασκαλία του μαθήματος της Βιολογίας του ΗμεÏησίου και του ΕσπεÏÎ¹Î½Î¿Ï Î“Ï…Î¼Î½Î±ÏƒÎ¯Î¿Ï… για το σχολικό Îτος 2021-2022 [Instructions for teaching the course of biology of the day and evening high school for the school year 2021-2022].
Niaz, M. (2014). Science textbooks: The role of history and philosophy of science. In M. R. Matthews (ed.) International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 1411–1441). Springer.
Nouri, N., Saberi, M., Mccomas, W., & Mohammadi, M. (2021). Proposed teacher competencies to support effective nature of science instruction: A meta-synthesis of the literature. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(6), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1871206.
NSTA Board of Directors. (2020). Nature of science/NSTA. https://www.nsta.org/nstas-official-positions/nature-science
O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideasâ€aboutâ€science†should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of research in science teaching, 40(7), 692–720. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10105
Popper, K. (2005). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.
Reiff-Cox, R. (2020). Exchanging the myth of a step-by-step scientific method for a more authentic description of inquiry in practice. In W. F. McCommas (Ed.), Nature of Science in Science Instruction (pp. 127–139). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57239-6_6
Smith, M. U., & Scharmann, L. C. (1999). Defining versus describing the nature of science: A pragmatic analysis for classroom teachers and science educators. Science Education, 83(4), 493–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199907)83:4<493::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-U
SlapniÄar, M. (2014). Khine Swe, M. (Ed.) (2013) Critical analysis of science textbooks: Evaluating instructional effectiveness. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 4(1), 137–141.
Solaz-Portolés, J. J. (2010). La naturaleza de la ciencia y libros de texto de ciencias: una revision. Educación [The nature of science and science textbooks: A review. Education] XX1, 13(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.13.1.277
Song, J., Chun, J., & Na, J. (2021). Why people trust something other than science. Science & Education, 30(6), 1387–1419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00243-w
Stasinakis, P. K., & Koliopoulos, D. (2009). Ανάλυση εγχειÏιδίων βιολογίας στη δευτεÏοβάθμια εκπαίδευση: Η πεÏίπτωση της Îννοιας της θÏÎψης φυτών και ζώων. ΘÎματα Επιστημών και Τεχνολογίας στην Εκπαίδευση [Analysis of biology textbooks in secondary education: The case of the concept of plant and animal nutrition]. Issues of Science and Technology in Education, 2(1–2), 103–125. http://earthlab.uoi.gr/ojs/thete/index.php/thete/article/view/25
Taber, K. S. (2021). The challenge to educational reforms during a global emergency: The case of progressive science education. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 11(Sp. Issue), 67–87. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1109
Weisberg, D. S., Landrum, A. R., Hamilton, J., & Weisberg, M. (2020). Knowledge about the nature of science increases public acceptance of science regardless of identity factors. Public Understanding of Science, 30(2), 120–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520977700
Yacoubian, H. A. (2020). Teaching nature of science through a critical thinking approach. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), Nature of science in science instruction: rationales and strategies (pp. 199–212). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57239-6_10
In order to ensure both the widest dissemination and protection of material published in CEPS Journal, we ask Authors to transfer to the Publisher (Faculty of Education, University of Ljubljana) the rights of copyright in the Articles they contribute. This enables the Publisher to ensure protection against infringement.
