Vodenje in konflikti v srbskih osnovnih šolah

  • Igor Kostovski University of Novi Sad, Technical Faculty “Mihajlo Pupin”, Zrenjanin, Serbia
  • Branka Janković Preschool Teaching College, Novi Sad, Serbia
  • Edit Terek Stojanović Univerity of Nov Sad, Technical faculty "Mihajlo Pupin", Zrenjanin, Serbia
  • Srđana Taboroši Faculty of Information Technologies, Alfa BK University, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Dragana Glušac University of Novi Sad, Technical Faculty “Mihajlo Pupin”, Zrenjanin, Serbia
  • Milan Nikolić University of Novi Sad, Technical Faculty “Mihajlo Pupin”, Zrenjanin, Serbia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.2379
Ključne besede: vodenje, izmenjava med vodjo in člani, konflikt, učitelji, osnovne šole, Srbija

Povzetek

Ta študija preučuje, kako so transformacijsko, transakcijsko in etično vodenje ter izmenjava med vodjo in člani povezani s konflikti ki se po javljajo v povezavi z nalogami, odnosi in s postopki v srbskih osnovnih šolah, ter preučuje, ali organizacijska zavezanost in razdalja moči ublažita te povezave. Podatki ankete so bili zbrani pri 380 učiteljih. Izsledki kažejo, da večina dimenzij vodenja zmanjšuje konflikte: osnovno transformacijsko vodenje zmanjšuje konflikte, povezane z nalogami, medtem ko izmenjava med vodjo in člani najmočneje zmanjšuje konflikte, povezane z odnosi in s postopki. Pogojno kaznovalno vedenje po drugi strani povečuje konflikte, podporno vodenje pa lahko v določenih kontekstih poveča konflikte, povezane z odnosi. Analize moderacije kažejo, da visoka organizacijska zavezanost in nizka razdalja moči okrepita učinke vodenja, ki zmanjšujejo konflikte. Organizacijska zavezanost okrepi učinke na konflikte, povezane z nalogami in s postopki, medtem ko nizka razdalja moči okrepi učinke na konflikte v odnosih. Ti izsledki poudarjajo medsebojno delovanje pristopa vodenja in organizacijskega konteksta pri razumevanju dinamike konfliktov v šolah ter ponujajo praktična navodila za spodbujanje zdravega medosebnega in delovnega okolja.

Prenosi

Podatki o prenosih še niso na voljo.

Literatura

Abdullah, Z., Alias, B. S., & Hamid, A. H. A. (2025). A comprehensive systematic review: Conflict management and teachers' work culture. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(1), 999–1009. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.9010083

Anderson, M. (2017). Transformational leadership in education: A review of existing literature. International Social Science Review, 93(1), 1–3.

Anjani, M., Nurahmayanti, A., & Amalia, B. (2025). The role of school principals in conflict mediation and policy negotiation with teachers at SMP Negeri 1 Parigi. International Journal of Education Management and Religion, 2(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.71305/ijemr.v2i1.171

Annet, K. A. (2025). Conflict resolution strategies for school leaders. Research Invention Journal of Current Issues in Arts and Management, 4(2), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.59298/rijciam/2025/42511

Anwar, S., Utaminingsih, S., Trihandayani, E., & Rachmawaty, S. (2024). Memadukan kepemimpinan transformasional dan transaksional dalam pendidikan [Integrating transformational and transactional leadership in education]. Pengabdian Masyarakat Sumber Daya Unggul, 2(4), 126–133. https://doi.org/10.37985/pmsdu.v2i4.869

Aquino, J. M., & Alvarez, M. L. R. (2023). Leadership behavior towards a scholastic group dynamics interaction among academic heads of one higher education institution (HEI) in the Philippines. International Journal of Education, 15(4), 99–126. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v15i4.21662

Aravidou, K., Triantari, S., & Zervas, I. (2025). Sustainable leadership and conflict management: Insights from Greece's public sector. Sustainability, 17(5), 2248–2248. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052248

Babalola, M. T., Stouten, J., & Euwema, M. (2016). Frequent change and turnover intention: The moderating role of ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(2), 311–322.

Babalola, M. T., Stouten, J., Euwema, M., & Ovadje, F. (2016). The relation between ethical leadership and workplace conflicts: The mediating role of employee resolution efficacy. Journal of Management, 44(5), 2037–2063. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316638163

Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134.

Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.

Chandolia, E., & Anastasiou, S. (2020). Leadership and conflict management style are associated with the effectiveness of school conflict management in the region of Epirus, NW Greece. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 10(1), 455–468.

Chernyak-Hai, L., & Tziner, A. (2014). Relationships between counterproductive work behavior, perceived justice and climate, occupational status, and leader-member exchange. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 30(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5093/tr2014a1

Cook, J., & Wall, T. (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfilment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53(1), 39–52.

Da'as, R. (2020). Between principals' and teachers' perspective taking: The role of transformational and transactional leadership styles. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 26(4), 722–744. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1850871

Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.

Gholap, S. (2026). A study on power and conflict management across culture. InSight Bulletin: A Multidisciplinary Interlink International Research Journal, 3(1), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18950924

Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader–member exchange (LMX) theory over 25 years. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247.

House, R. J., Javidan, M., Hanges, P., & Dorfman, P. (2002). Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: An introduction to Project GLOBE. Journal of World Business, 37(1), 3–10.

Hussin, H., Hashim, N., Abas, N., & Hussin, H. (2025). Conceptual study on harmony in chaos: Leadership paradigms for resolving modern workplace conflicts. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Management Practices, 8(29), 176–197. https://doi.org/10.35631/ijemp.829013

Ivancevich, J. M., & Matteson, M. T. (2002). Organizational behavior and management (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Jehn, K. A., Greer, L., Levine, S., & Szulanski, G. (2008). The effects of conflict types, dimensions, and emergent states on group outcomes. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17(6), 465–495.

Jingting, W. (2025). Legally grounded ethical practices and conflict management strategies: Developing a capacity-building program for school leaders. International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 7(4), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.54476/ioer-imrj/877619

Johnson, P. E. (2003). Conflict and the school leader: Expert or novice. Journal of Research for Educational Leaders, 11(3), 28–45.

Kedir, K., & Geleta, A. (2017). Leading educational change: The practices of transformational leadership in the Ethiopian technical vocational education and training institutions. International Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, 9(5), 46–61.

Łucjan, K., Szostek, D., Balcerzak, A. P., & Rogalska, E. (2023). Relationships between leadership style and organizational commitment: The moderating role of the system of work. Economics & Sociology, 16(4), 11–39. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789x.2023/16-4/1

MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Rich, G. A. (2001). Transformational and transactional leadership and salesperson performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(2), 115–134.

Maral, M., & Hamedoglu, M. (2021). Does leadership style of school administrators affect conflict management? Apuntes Universitarios. 12(1), 268–287.

Mlinarević, V., Tokić Zec, R., & Cvjetičanin, A. (2022). A model of transformational leadership in the organisational culture of preschool institution. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 12(3), 103–126.

Northouse, P. G. (2008). Leadership: Theory and practice (4th ed.). Data Status.

Parcon, R., & Pedroso, J. E. (2025). Mediation practices of school principals in the private school. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 3(4), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v3i4.646

Podsakoff, Ph. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107–142.

Podsakoff, Ph. M., Todor, W. D., Grover, R. A., & Huber, V. L. (1984). Situational moderators of leader reward and punishment behaviors: Fact or fiction? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34(1), 21–63.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2009). Organizational behavior (12th ed.). Prentice Hall.

Rosiana, I., & Nugraha, M. S. (2026). Building effective leadership at MIN I Bandung: A combination of transformational and transactional styles. Tadbiruna, 5(2), 214–226. https://doi.org/10.51192/jurnalmanajemenpendidikanislam.v5i2.2348

Saiti, A. (2014). Conflicts in schools, conflict management styles and the role of the school leader: A study of Greek primary school educators. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(4), 582–609.

Sari, Y., & Lestari, S. (2025). Ethical leadership strategies of school principals: Fostering a harmonious and productive teacher work environment. AL-ISHLAH Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(1), 489–499. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i1.6090

Tahiraj, I. (2022). Organisational culture in public university: A case study of faculty of education. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 12(3), 127–149.

Tusianah, R., Sudjarwo, Sutarsyah, C., Agustina, E. S., & Rahman, B. (2023). Does transformational leadership still run effectively in a conflict setting? WSEAS Transactions on Systems, 22, 495–511.

Uzun, T., & Ayik, A. (2017). Relationship between communication competence and conflict management styles of school principals. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 68, 169–188.

Vinokur, E., Yomtovian, A., Marom, M. S., Itzchakov, G., & Baron, L. (2024) Social-based learning and leadership in school: Conflict management training for holistic, relational conflict resolution. Frontiers in Social Psychology, 2, Article 1412968. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsps.2024.1412968

Wall Jr., J. A., & Callister, R. R. (1995). Conflict and its management. Journal of Management, 21(3), 515–558.

Wardani, A. R., Hasanah, H., Hidayat, Q. I., Hidayatullah, S., & Muallimin, M. (2024). Peran kepemimpinan sekolah dalam mengatasi konflik antar guru dan dampaknya terhadap kinerja institusi [The role of school leadership in managing teacher conflicts and its impact on institutional performance]. Jurnal Insan Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora, 2(4), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.59581/jipsoshum-widyakarya.v2i4.4264

Yue, C. (2023). Educational administrators' leadership styles and teachers' organizational commitment: Inputs for a work engagement program. Open Journal of Leadership, 12(3), 352–373. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojl.2023.123017

Zhou, M., & Shi, S. (2014). Blaming leaders for team relationship conflict? The role of leader–member exchange differentiation and ethical leadership. Nankai Business Review International, 5(2), 134–146.

Objavljeno
2026-09-16
Kako citirati
Kostovski, I., Janković, B., Terek Stojanović, E., Taboroši, S., Glušac, D., & Nikolić, M. (2026). Vodenje in konflikti v srbskih osnovnih šolah. Revija Centra Za študij Edukacijskih Strategij . https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.2379
Številka
2026: Recently Accepted Papers
Rubrike
VARIA

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
  2. The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
  3. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.