Razvoj raziskovanja na področju kemijskega izobraževanja na Univerzi v Novem Sadu po razpadu Socialistične federativne republike Jugoslavije
Povzetek
Prvi zagovor doktorata znanosti na področju kemijskega izobraževanja na Fakulteti za naravoslovje Univerze v Novem Sadu je bil leta 1992. To lahko štejemo za simbolni začetek kemijskega izobraževanja kot znanstvene discipline v tej regiji. Po uradnem razpadu Socialistične federativne republike Jugoslavije se je raziskovanje, začeto v 80. letih prejšnjega stoletja ter osredinjeno na razvoj orodij za ocenjevanje kakovosti in fleksibilnosti znanja študentov, nadaljevalo tudi v 90. letih prejšnjega stoletja. V raziskavo smo vključili uporabo računalnikov v poučevanje kemije pa tudi razvoj primernih programov za učenje kemije. V naslednjem obdobju se je raziskovanje osredinjalo na analizo programov za poučevanje kemije v Republiki Srbiji, s posebnim poudarkom na možnosti vključevanja ekokemijskih vsebin v kurikulum. Skladno s tem so bili predlagani potencialno učinkoviti modeli poučevanja kemije. Najnovejše raziskave se osredinjajo na preučevanje učinkovitosti učnih strategij, ki temeljijo na sistemskem pristopu in trojnem modelu predstavljanja vsebine z uporabo preverjanja uspešnosti učencev in njihovih miselnih naporov pri tem. S tem namenom so bila razvita orodja za učinkovito ocenjevanje znanja (sistemska sintezna vprašanja, kontekstualna vprašanja), skupaj z orodji za učinkovito ocenjevanje napačnih razumevanj študentov (večdelne naloge v preizkusih znanja). Poleg tega so bili za izboljšanje poučevanja pred kratkim razviti postopki za ocenjevanje kognitivne kompleksnosti kemijskih problemov, ki so bili potrjeni statistično in tudi z uporabo teorije prostorskega znanja (KST – Knowledge Space Theory).Prenosi
Literatura
Adamov, J., Segedinac, M., Cvjeticanin, S., & Bakoš, R. (2009). Concept maps as diagnostic tools in assessing the acquisition and retention of knowledge in biochemistry. Odgojne znanosti, 11(1), 53–71. Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/40001
Adamov, J., & Segedinac, M. (2006a). Application of information-communication technologies (ICT) in science in primary schools in Novi Sad, Serbia. In O. Gajić (Ed.), Evropske dimenzije promena obrazovnog sistema u Srbiji. Na putu ka “Evropi znanja†[European dimensions of changes in the educational system in Serbia. On the road to “Europe of knowledgeâ€] (pp. 275–286). Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet.
Adamov, J., & Segedinac, M. (2006b). Elektronska uÄionica u savremenoj nastavnoj praksi [The electronic classroom in contemporary teaching practice]. Pedagogija, 61(4), 531–542.
Adamov, J., & Segedinac, M. (2006c). Razvoj i organizacija elektronskog nastavnog kursa [The development and organisation of an electronic teaching course]. In O. Gajić (Ed.), Evropske dimenzije promena obrazovnog sistema u Srbiji. Od društva znanja ka društvu obrazovanja – evropski okviri kompatibilnosti obrazovnih standarda (pp. 333–356). Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet.
Adamov, J., & Segedinac, M. (2007). The role of communication technologies in defining and valuing interaction in online learning. In O. Gajić (Ed.), Evropske dimenzije promena obrazovnog sistema u Srbiji. Na putu ka “Evropi znanja†[European dimensions of changes in the educational system in Serbia. On the road to “Europe of Knowledgeâ€] (pp. 305–316). Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet.
Adamov, J., Marković, D., & Olić, S. (2012). Ispitivanje nauÄne pismenosti studenata prirodnih nauka [An examination of the scientific literacy of natural sciences students]. In O. Gajić (Ed.), Kvalitet obrazovnog sistema Srbije u evropskoj perspektivi - Zbornik radova, knjiga 2 (pp. 167–182). Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet.
Adamov, J., Segedinac, M., Ković, M., Olić, S., & Horvat, S. (2012). Laboratory experiment as a motivational factor to learn in Roma elementary school children. The New Educational Review, 28(2), 153–164.
Adamоv, J., & Segedinac, M. (2011). Miniprоjekti u uvоđenju hemijskih nastavnih sadržaja u nastavu prirоde u nižim razredima оsnоvne Å¡kоle [Miniprojects in the introduction of chemical teaching content in the teaching subject of natural sciences in lower primary school]. In S. Cvjetićanin (Ed.), Primena uÄeniÄkih miniprоjekata u realizaciji nastave integrisanih prirоdnih nauka i matematike u razrednоj nastavi (pp. 9–25). Sоmbоr: Pedagоški fakultet.
Adamоv, J., & Оlić, S. (2014). Predlоg individualizоvanоg prоgrama za nastavu hemije za darоvite uÄenike [Proposal for an individualised programme for teaching chemistry to gifted students]. NaÅ¡a Å¡kоla, 69(239), 97–111.
Adamоv, J., & Оlić, S. (2015). Оstvarenоst оbrazоvnih standarda za kraj оbaveznоg оbrazоvanja za nastavni predmet hemija [The realisation of educational standards for the end of compulsory education for a chemistry course]. Nastava i vaspitanje, 64(2), 223–237.
Adamоv, J., Radanоv, Lj., Оlić, S., & Segedinac, M. (2012). Analiza stavоva nastavnika i uÄenika о pоtrebi za uvоđenjem hemije u VI razred [Analysis of teachers’ and students’ attitudes towards the need for introducing chemistry in the 6th grade]. Pedagоgija, 67(3), 376–386.
Adamоv, J., Оlić, S., & HalaÅ¡i, T. (2014). Multidisciplinarni uÄeniÄki prоjekti - primer integrisanja sadržaja u оkviru teme “Zdrava hrana†[Multidisciplinary student projects - an example of content integration within the theme “Healthy Foodâ€]. In S. Cvjetićanin (Ed.), Miniprijekti u nastavi integrisanih prirоdnih nauka i matematike 2 (pp. 9–22). Sоmbоr: Pedagоški fakultet.
Adamоv, J., Оlić, S., & Segedinac, M. (2014). MiÅ¡ljenja nastavnika hemije о identifikоvanju i radu sa darоvitim uÄenicima [Chemistry teachers’ beliefs regarding identifying and working with gifted students]. Pedagоgija, 69(2), 268–275.
Adamоv, J., Оlić, S., Segedinac, M., Ninkоvić, S., & KоvaÄević, M. (2013). NauÄna pismenоst оdraslih u Vоjvоdini [Scientific literacy of adults in Vojvodina]. Andragоške studije, (1), 23–36.
Aram, R. J., & Manahan, S. E. (1995). Environmental chemistry and environmental science: A survey of courses offered in U.S. colleges and universities. Journal of Chemical Education, 72(11), 977–978. doi: 10.1021/ed072p977
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3,4), 369–398. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_8
Cetin-Dindar, A., & Geban, Ö. (2011). Development of a three-tier test to assess high school students' understanding of acids and bases. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 600−604. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.147
Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F., & Mocerino, M. (2007). The development of a two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic instrument for evaluating secondary school students' ability to describe and explain chemical reactions using multiple levels of representation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(3), 293–307. doi:10.1039/B7RP90006F
Cvjeticanin, S., Segedinac, M., & Adamov, J. (2010). Model of permanent eco-chemical education of employees of chemical industry in the function of ecological development. Problemy Ekorozwoju – Problems of Sustainable Development, 5(1), 53–58.
CvjetiÄanin, S., Segedinac, M., & HalaÅ¡i,T. (2010). ZnaÄaj primene eksperimenta u razrednоj nastavi [The importance of applying the experiment in classroom teaching]. Nastava i vaspitanje, 59(2), 173–189.
Cvjetićanin, S., Segedinac, M., & Letić, Lj. (2008). Nastavni sadržaji o hemijskoj proizvodnji u osnovnoj školi [Teaching content about chemical production in primary school]. Nastava i vaspitanje, 57(4), 441–454.
Cvjetićanin, S., Segedinac, M., & Letić, Lj. (2009). Chemical industrial production and applied chemistry of metals and nonmetals in educational program of chemistry in elementary school. Hemijska industrija, 63(2), 129–136.
Cvjeticanin, S., Segedinac, M., Adamov, J., & Brankovic, N. (2008b). Primena principa heuristiÄke nastave u formiranju znanja uÄenika drugog razreda o uticaju toplote na živa bića i materijale [Application of the principles of heuristic teaching in the formation of second grade studentsʼ knowledge about the influence of heat on living beings and materials]. NaÅ¡a Å¡kola, 14(46), 103–115.
Cvjetićanin, S., Segedinac, M., Adamov, J., & Branković, N. (2008a). Eksperimenti o toploti u razrednoj nastavi [Heat experiments in classroom teaching]. Vaspitanje i obrazovanje, 66(1), 91–109.
Evagorou, M., Korfiatis, K., Nicolaou, C., & Constantinou, C. (2009). An investigation of the potential of interactive simulations for developing thinking skills in elementary school: A case study with fifth-grades and sixth-grades. International Journal of Science Education, 31(5), 655–674. doi: 10.1080/09500690701749313
Fahmy, A. F. M., & Lagowski, J. J. (2003). Systemic reform in chemical education: An international perspective. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(9), 1078–1083. doi:10.1021/ed080p1078
Glynn, S. M., & Koballa, T. R. (2006). Motivation to learn in college science. In J. J. Mintzes, & W. H. Leonard (Eds.), Handbook of college science teaching (pp. 25–32). Arlington, TX: National science teachers association press.
Halaši, R., Segedinac, M., Kоnjоvić, Z., & Halaši, T. (1995). Primena kоmpjutera u individualizaciji hemije [The application of computers in the individualisation of chemistry]. In E. Kamenоv (Ed.), Оrganizacija i unapređenje instituciоnalnоg vaspitanja i оbrazоvanja (pp. 79–93). Nоvi Sad: Filоzоfski fakultet.
Halaši, T. (2004). Ulоga savremene оbrazоvne tehnоlоgije i medija u zemljama u tranziciji-refоrma škоlstva u republici Mađarskоj [The role of contemporary educational technology and media in transition countries - Reform of education in the Republic of Hungary]. In E. Kamenоv (Ed.), Strategija razvоja sistema vaspitanja i оbrazоvanja u uslоvima tranzicije (pp. 200–222). Nоvi Sad: Filоzоfski fakultet.
Horvat, S., Rodić, D. D., Segedinac, M. D., & RonÄević,T. N. (2017). Evaluation of cognitive complexity of tasks for the topic hydrogen exponent in the solutions of acids and bases. Journal of Subject Didactics, 2(1), 33–45. doi:10.5281/zenodo.1238972
Horvat, S., Rodić, D., RonÄević, T., & Segedinac, M. (2019). Validation of method for the assessment of cognitive complexity of chemical technology problem tasks. In V. Lamanauskas (Ed.), Science and technology education: Current challenges and possible solutions. Proceedings of the 3rd International Baltic Symposium on Science and Technology Education (BalticSTE2019) (pp. 67–70). Å iauliai: Scientia Socialis Press.
Horvat, S., Segedinac, M., Milenković, D., & Hrin, T. (2016). Development of procedure for the assessment of cognitive complexity of stoichiometric tasks. Macedonian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, 35(2), 275–284. doi: 10.20450/mjcce.2016.893
Hrin, T. N., Fahmy, A. F. M., Segedinac, M. D., & Milenković, D. D. (2016a). Systemic synthesis questions [SSynQs] as tools to help students to build their cognitive structures in a systemic manner. Research in Science Education, 46(4), 525–546. doi:10.1007/s11165-015-9470-1
Hrin, T. N., Milenković, D. D., & Segedinac, M. D. (2016b). The effect of systemic synthesis questions [SSynQs] on students’ performance and meaningful learning in secondary organic chemistry teaching. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(5), 805–824. doi: 10.1007/s10763-015-9620-y
Hrin, T. N., Milenković, D. D., & Segedinac, M. D. (2018). Diagnosing the quality of high school students’ and pre-service chemistry teachers’ cognitive structures in organic chemistry by using students’ generated systemic synthesis questions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(1), 305–318. doi:10.1039/C7RP00162B
Hrin, T. N., Milenković, D. D., Segedinac, M. D., & Horvat, S. (2016c). Enhancement and assessment of students’ systems thinking skills by application of systemic synthesis questions in the organic chemistry course. Journal of Serbian Chemical Society, 81(12), 1455–1471. doi:10.2298/JSC160811097H
Hrin, T. N., Milenković, D. D., Segedinac, M. D., & Horvat, S. (2017). Systems thinking in chemistry classroom: The influence of systemic synthesis questions on its development and assessment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 175–187. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2017.01.003
Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75–83. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.x
Johnstone, A. H. (1993). The development of chemistry teaching: A changing response to changing demand. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(9), 701–705. doi:10.1021/ed070p701
Johnstone, A. H., & Otis, K. H. (2006). Concept mapping in problem based learning: A cautionary tale. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(2), 84–95. doi: 10.1039/B5RP90017D
Kidanemariam, D. A., Atagana, H. I., & Engida, T. (2014). Do learning styles influence students' understanding of concepts and academic performance in chemistry? Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(16), 256–260. doi:10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n16p256
Knaus, K., Murphy, K., Blecking, A., & Holme, T. (2011). A valid and reliable instrument for cognitive complexity rating assignment of chemistry exam items. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(5), 554–560. doi:10.1021/ed900070y
Kolb, A., & Kolb, D. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193–212. doi:10.5465/amle.2005.17268566
Krause, M., Pietzner, V., Dori, Y. J., & Eilks, I. (2017). Differences and developments in attitudes and self-efficacy of prospective chemistry teachers concerning the use of ICT in education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 4405–4417. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.00935a
Lam, S., Cheng, R. W., & Choy, H. C. (2010). School support and teacher motivation to implement project-based learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(6), 487–497. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.07.003
Maravić, M., Ivković, S., Adamov, J., & Segedinac, M. (2014). Serbian school system as a barrier to the development of environmental awareness. New Educational Review, 36(2), 229–239.
Maravić, M., Ivković, S., Segedinac M., & Adamov J. (2014). Environmental issues in didactic materials in schools in the Republic of Serbia. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 4(2), 61–69. doi:10.18497/iejee-green.38387
Milenković, D., Hrin, T., Segedinac, M., & Horvat, S. (2016a). Development of a three-tier test as a valid diagnostic tool for identification of misconceptions related to carbohydrates. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(9), 1514–1520. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00261
Milenković, D., Hrin, T., Segedinac, M., & Horvat, S. (2016b). Identification of misconceptions through multiple choice tasks at municipal chemistry competition test. Journal of Subject Didactics, 1(1), 3–12. doi:10.5281/zenodo.55468
Milenković, D., Segedinac, M., & Hrin, T. (2014). Increasing high school students’ performance and reducing cognitive load through an instructional strategy based on the interaction of multiple levels of knowledge representation. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(9), 1409–1416. doi:10.1021/ed400805p
Milenković, D., Segedinac, M., Hrin, T., & Gajić, G. (2015). Evaluation of context-level effect on students' performance and perceived cognitive load in chemistry problem-solving tasks. Croatian Journal of Education, 17(4), 959–982. doi:10.15516/cje.v17i4.1212
Milenković, D., Segedinac, M., Hrin, T., & Horvat, S. (2016). The impact of instructional strategy based on the triplet model of content representation on elimination of students' misconceptions regarding inorganic reactions. Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society, 81(6), 717–728. doi:10.2298/JSC150812021M
Novak, J. D. (2010). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. New York, NY: Routledge.
Novak J. D., & Gowin D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Olić, S., & Adamov, J. (2016). Relationship between learning styles of grammar students and school achievement. Teme, 40(4), 1223–1240.
Olić, S., & Adamov, J. (2017). Nastavne strategije i uÄeniÄko postignuće u hemiji [Teaching strategies and student achievement in chemistry]. Nastava i vaspitanje, 66(1), 55–66.
Olić, S., & Adamov, J. (2018a). The relationship between learning styles and students’ chemistry achievement. Macedonian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, 37(1), 79–88. doi:10.20450/mjcce.2018.1400
Olić, S., & Adamov, J. (2018b). Pristupi uÄenju kod studenata hemije [Learning approaches in chemistry students]. Pedagogija, 73(2), 318–335.
Olić, S., Adamov, J., & Babić-Kekez, S. (2017). Motivacija studenata hemije za izuÄavanje hemijskih nastavnih sadržaja [The motivation of chemistry students for learning chemical teaching content]. PedagoÅ¡ka stvarnost, 63(1), 41–51.
Olić, S., Adamоv, J., & Babić-Kekez, S. (2014). Mоtivacija kaо prediktоr uÄeniÄkоg pоstignuća u hemiji [Motivation as a predictor of student achievement in chemistry]. Istraživanja u pedagоgiji, 4(2), 24–36.
Olić, S., Ninković, S., & Adamov, J. (2016). Adaptation and empirical evaluation of the questionnaire on students’ motivation towards science learning. Psihologija, 49(1), 51–66. doi:10.2298/PSI1601051O
Passow, A. H. (1981). The nature of giftedness and talent. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25(1), 5–10.
Pendley, B. D., Bretz, R. L., & Novak, J. D. (1994). Concept maps as a tool to assess learning in chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 71(1), 9–17. doi:10.1021/ed071p9
Raker, J. R., Trate, J. M., Holme, T. A., & Murphy, K. (2013). Adaptation of an instrument for measuring the cognitive complexity of organic chemistry exam items. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(10), 1290–1295. doi:10.1021/ed400373c
Regis, A., Albertazzi, P., & Roletto E. (1996). Concept maps in chemistry education. Journal of Chemical Education, 73(11), 1084–1088. doi:10.1021/ed073p1084
Salta, K., & Koulougliotis, D. (2015). Assessing motivation to learn chemistry: Adaptation and validation of science motivation questionnaire II with Greek secondary school students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 237–250. doi:10.1039/C4RP00196F
Segedinac, M. T., Horvat, S., Rodić, D. D., RonÄević, T. N., & Savić, G. (2018). Using knowledge space theory to compare expected and real knowledge spaces in learning stoichiometry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(3), 670–680. doi:10.1039/C8RP00052B
Segedinac, M., & Halaši, R. (1998). Blumova taksonomija kao osnova za konkretizaciju i operacionalizaciju ciljeva i zadataka nastave hemije u nastavnoj oblasti struktura materije [Bloom’s taxonomy as a basis for the concretisation and operationalisation of chemistry teaching goals and tasks in the teaching theme the structure of matter]. Pedagogija, 31(2), 88–99.
Segedinac, M., Adamov, J., & HalaÅ¡i, T. (2007). Korelacija nastavnih sadržaja hemije i užestruÄnih predmeta prehrambene struke u srednjem obrazovanju [The correlation of chemistry teaching content and extracurricular subjects of food industry in secondary education]. PedagoÅ¡ka stvarnost, 53(1–2), 42–50.
Segedinac, M., Konjović, Z., & Dukić, Lj. (1994). Identifikacija faktora kreativnosti u nastavi hemije [The identification of creativity factors in chemistry teaching]. Nastava i vaspitanje, 43(1-2), 31–37.
Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2006). Chemical literacy: What it means to scientists and school teachers?. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(10), 1557–1561. doi:10.1021/ed083p1557
Tuan, H. L., Chin, C. C., & Shyang, S. H. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure student's motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 639–654. doi:10.1080/0950069042000323737
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
